$20 Bonus + 25% OFF CLAIM OFFER

Place Your Order With Us Today And Go Stress-Free

A Comparitive Study Of ISO 10006 And Agile project Management
  • 3

  • Course Code:
  • University: Dublin Business School
  • Country: Ireland


The objective of this comparison study is to examine the integration of ISO 10006 and Agile project management methodologies into the manufacturing industry, with the aim of enhancing the success rate of projects. The study examines the widely recognized ISO 10006 and the cutting-edge Agile methodology, aiming to ascertain the advantages and disadvantages of each of these techniques.

The research focuses on the dynamic challenges encountered by the industrial industry. Given the conditions, the inquiry addresses the crucial need for a project management approach that is both well-rounded and strategic. This research aims to examine the key elements, differences, and potential areas of convergence between Agile and ISO 10006.

This study adopts a hybrid design, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative research methodologies, with a sample size of two hundred participants from the industrial sector. The initial results underscore the need of structured communication and the dualistic character of Agile methodologies.

The research findings provide valuable insights to decision-makers, helping them navigate the complexities of the project and identify suitable areas for integrating customized solutions in the manufacturing business.



1.1    Introduction

Within the ever-changing field of project management, companies—especially those immovably established within the fabricating sector—continuously look for out novel ways to extend the success rates of their projects. The comparison of Agile project management techniques with ISO 10006 is the main focus of this study. These approaches were chosen because of their widespread use in many Industries and their unique qualities, which provide a strong foundation for investigation.

The Manufacturing Industry has complex tasks, making excellent project management essential for organisations (Koch et al., 2023). The conventional project management technique, ISO 10006, offers a defined framework that has been essential to the successful completion of projects. Agile approaches, on the other hand, have ended up more well-known due to their centre on adjustment to alter, adaptability, and iterative advancement. 

The purpose of the study is to compare Agile and ISO 10006 methodologies to shed light on their advantages and disadvantages. The investigation of possible integration points that follow is expected to provide organisations with a more sophisticated knowledge of how combining various approaches might be a tactical benefit when managing the intricacies of manufacturing projects.

1.2    Background of the Problem

The manufacturing sector works in a dynamic environment with complex projects that demand efficient management techniques to fulfil strict deadlines, keep expenses under control, and guarantee the delivery of high-quality goods (Kumar et al., 2020).

The industry has always depended on tried-and-true project management techniques, with ISO 10006 emerging as a key organising principle. This traditional method has contributed significantly to the industry’s capacity to handle challenging jobs by offering defined recommendations for project execution.

Nonetheless, the Agile approach has resulted in a radical change in the project management environment. Agile has become a disruptive force, upending established conventions and approaches by emphasising flexibility, teamwork, and iterative development.

Unlike the sequential and linear methods outlined in ISO 10006, Agile emphasises flexibility, enabling teams to react quickly to changing project needs. The recognition of the dynamic and unpredictable character of projects within the Manufacturing Industry is reflected in this paradigm shift.

Agile techniques and ISO 10006 together offer a powerful potential and challenge to the manufacturing sector (Gaborov et al., 2021). Although ISO 10006 has demonstrated its dependability in offering a methodical approach, Agile presents a more adaptable and cooperative framework.

This backdrop emphasises how urgently a thorough research into the relative merits of these two project management approaches in the particular setting of the Manufacturing Industry is needed. The need for organisations to strike a balance between efficiency, creativity, and agility makes it critical for decision-makers to be aware of the advantages and disadvantages of both Agile and ISO 10006.

1.3    The Rationale for the Research

The need to balance traditional methods with newly developed approaches in the ever-changing field of project management is what spurred this research. Businesses in the manufacturing sector face significant difficulty when deciding which project management methodology would best fit their particular set of contextual needs. Because of the inherent diversity of projects in this industry, optimising project results requires a thorough grasp of approaches.

Organisations may obtain significant insights by using a strategic perspective to compare the Agile and ISO 10006 approaches (Younus et al., 2021). Conventional project management frameworks, including ISO 10006, have long been trusted for their organised and methodical approach.

On the other hand, the agile approach may be a more versatile and fluid paradigm that’s perfect for managing the vulnerabilities that are predominant in energetic segments such as manufacturing. Through a comparison of distinctive approaches, the consideration looks to supply an intensive get handle on each approach’s focal points and impediments.

The goal of this investigation is to arm associations with the data they have to make astute choices. The investigation points to offer a strong premise for choosing the most excellent arrangement based on extended highlights, authoritative culture, and industry elements in a setting where extended victory is vital.

Furthermore, the investigation of possible integration areas recognises the complexity of project management and the possibility that there may not be a single, best-fitting solution. By using this justification, the research hopes to advance project management techniques in the manufacturing sector by providing a flexible and sophisticated foundation for increased project success.

Also Read - Project Management Assignment Help

1.4    Research Questions and Aims

The study aims to compare Agile and ISO 10006 project management approaches in-depth with the ultimate goal of raising project success rates in the manufacturing sector. The study is guided by the following research questions:

Research Objectives: 

•    To examine and understand the basic ideas and components of the project management methodology defined by ISO 10006.
•  To analyse the fundamental ideas and methods of Agile project management, emphasising how it differs significantly from the ISO 10006 approach.
•    To assess the benefits and drawbacks of Agile and ISO 10006 approaches for managing projects of various sizes and complexity.
•    To find possible points of convergence between Agile and ISO 10006 approaches, investigating methods to maximise each approach's advantages and minimise its disadvantages.

Research questions: 

RQ 1: What core ideas and components make up the project management methodology defined by ISO 10006?
RQ 2: How do the ISO 10006 methodology's guidelines for project management vary from the concepts and procedures of agile project management?
RQ 3: What are the benefits and drawbacks of agile techniques and ISO 10006 for handling projects with different levels of complexity and scope in the manufacturing sector?
RQ 4: How can Agile and ISO 10006 techniques be combined to solve each other's shortcomings and build on their respective strengths? What effect may this combination have on project success rates in the manufacturing sector?

1.5    Overview of ISO 10006 and Agile Project Management

Methodologies for project management are essential for assisting organisations in navigating the challenges of completing projects successfully. The International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), which is the foundation of ISO 10006, provides an organised and methodical approach. Its three main tenets are continual improvement, process orientation, and customer satisfaction (Jadoon et al., 2020).

The elements cover the planning, carrying out, and wrapping up of the project, with a focus on documentation, communication, and risk management. With its historical basis in quality management, ISO 10006 offers a framework that conforms to accepted norms and procedures.

Agile project management, on the other hand, is a paradigm change, especially in fields like software development where responsiveness and flexibility are critical. The Agile Manifesto’s agile principles place a higher value on people and their relationships, practical solutions, and customer collaboration than they do on inflexible procedures and copious paperwork (Noteboom et al., 2021).

Iterative development is embraced by agile methods like Scrum and Kanban, which enable teams to react quickly to changing needs. Agile historical background stems from the necessity for adaptability in project contexts that are unpredictable and dynamic.

Comprehending the fundamental components of Agile and ISO 10006 is necessary for the comparative study that follows in later chapters. While Agile offers a more flexible and collaborative approach, recognising the inherent unpredictability in many projects, ISO 10006 offers a strong framework that guarantees consistency and quality. Both approaches have unique benefits and drawbacks, therefore assessing their suitability in the context of the manufacturing industry requires a thorough comprehension of their underlying ideas and evolutionary history.

Also Read - Leadership Assignment Help

1.6    Contribution of the Research

The goal of this research is to make a substantial contribution to improving project management techniques in the manufacturing sector. This study’s distinctive value is found in its painstaking and thorough comparison of Agile and ISO 10006 techniques.

By examining these two well-known strategies, the study aims to provide useful information that can be influence decision-making in companies working on complicated projects.

This study attempts to offer a clear understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of both Agile and ISO 10006 approaches by breaking down their core ideas and constituent parts (Ciric Lalic et al., 2022).

This knowledge serves as the foundation for useful suggestions made specifically to address the unique difficulties faced by the manufacturing sector. The research findings may be utilised as a guide to enhance project management tactics, as companies aim to achieve efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and timely project delivery.

Furthermore, this study’s innovative component is the identification of possible integration regions. Acknowledging that a hybrid strategy might use the advantages of both approaches while reducing their respective drawbacks, the study creates new opportunities for businesses looking for customised solutions (Ju et al., 2020).

This new dimension gives the corpus of knowledge on project management more depth and provides a mechanism for organisations to match their methods to the specific requirements of their projects.

Beyond merely exploring theoretical ideas, this research aims to serve as a useful manual for decision-makers in the manufacturing sector. The study intends to enable organisations to more precisely traverse the intricacies of project management, eventually leading to increased project success rates, by bridging the theory-application divide.

1.7     Summary

This introduction provides the groundwork for the thorough analysis that compares Agile project management with ISO 10006 in the manufacturing sector. The manufacturing sector, which is known for its complex projects, has many obstacles to overcome, making a sophisticated approach to project management necessary. This chapter provides background information on these issues and sets the stage for the next discussion of ISO 10006 and Agile techniques.

The challenges confronting the manufacturing sector are exemplified by the need for precise project management to meet stringent deadlines, cut expenses, and generate items of the greatest calibre (Koch et al., 2023). The historical reliance on established techniques, such as ISO 10006, opens the door to a critical evaluation of recognised standards in the context of a changing environment. Agile approaches, with their emphasis on adaptability and iterative processes, present a compelling alternative that warrants close analysis. 


Literature Review

2.1 Introduction 

In the continually changing environment of the industrial industry, project success is critical for maintaining competitiveness. As the sector faces new difficulties, project management approaches are becoming increasingly important in guaranteeing efficient operations and on-time delivery.

The traditional method, as defined by ISO 10006, has long been a pillar in the manufacturing industry, offering a standardised framework for project execution. However, the introduction of agile techniques has resulted in a paradigm change that emphasises adaptability, cooperation, and iterative development. 

This literature study compares ISO 10006 with agile project management methodologies, to dissect their underlying concepts, highlight variances, and scrutinise their usefulness in the context of the manufacturing business.

This study intends to give insights into the integration of different techniques by addressing major research concerns such as the underlying principles behind ISO 10006, the distinctions from agile methodologies, and the advantages and downsides of each. The ultimate goal is to investigate how a synergistic application of Agile and ISO 10006 might be used to optimise project management in manufacturing, promoting a balance of efficiency, innovation, and flexibility for increased project success rates. 

2.2 Empirical study  

2.2.1 A Comparative Exploration of ISO 10006 and Agile Methodologies in Manufacturing 

The project's success in the industrial sector in the face of dynamic obstacles has motivated a detailed examination of project management approaches. Historically, the industry has depended on well-established practices such as ISO 10006, which offers a systematic framework for project execution, considerably contributing to effective project management.

However, with the disruptive power of Agile project management, the environment has altered, challenging established standards and emphasising flexibility, cooperation, and iterative development.

A systematic literature review conducted by (Noteboom et al., 2021) provides insight into the adoption drivers and crucial success criteria of Agile project management. This analysis focuses on the transformative influence of Agile techniques on project management practises across several sectors, emphasising the necessity for organisations to adopt a more flexible and collaborative approach. The findings highlight a trend away from traditional, sequential processes, such as those mandated by ISO 10006, and towards more flexible and iterative approaches.

The comparative analysis reported here is consistent with the findings emphasising the dynamic nature of the manufacturing business and the necessity for flexible reactions to unforeseen project circumstances.

The research questions posed in this study reflect the broader discourse on project management methodologies, to understand the fundamental principles of ISO 10006, the differences from Agile methodologies, and the potential benefits and drawbacks of each approach in managing projects of varying complexity and scope.

As organisations strive for a mix of efficiency, innovation, and adaptability in project management, this literature study adds to the ongoing discussion by giving a thorough examination of Agile and ISO 10006 methodologies.

The assessment intends to enlighten decision-makers on how an integrated strategy may potentially optimise project success rates in the changing environment of the manufacturing industry by investigating prospective sites of convergence.

2.2.2 Agile Integration in Industries 4.0

The manufacturing sector is undergoing a revolutionary period in project management, defined by the use of Agile approaches to negotiate the intricacies of dynamic situations. The case study, which looks into the application of Agile project management methodologies in an Industry 4.0 Learning Factory in China, makes an important addition to this discussion. This research offers useful insights into the actual application of Agile techniques in a real-world industrial scenario, as well as a nuanced view of their efficacy.

The case study emphasises the Industry 4.0 paradigm, which is consistent with the industry’s overall push towards digitization and smart manufacturing. The author (Scholz et al. 2020) focus on the Chinese environment, demonstrating how Agile project management can be a strategic advantage in negotiating the complexities of Industry 4.0 undertakings. The research investigates the obstacles encountered and solutions found via the use of Agile techniques, giving light to the adaptability and responsiveness necessary in modern production.

This study reflects the pragmatic perspective through which Agile techniques are assessed. The research questions posed in the preceding analysis are consistent with the themes explored by the author, who is interested in understanding the core principles of ISO 10006, contrasting them with Agile methodologies, and weighing the benefits and drawbacks of managing projects of varying complexity in the manufacturing sector.

2.2.3 Organizational Learning in Industry 4.0

The expanding Industry 4.0 landscape has resulted in a paradigm change in organisational learning within the industrial industry. A systematic literature review provides a thorough examination of the relationship between organisational learning and Industry 4.0. This research sheds light on the dynamics of knowledge acquisition and diffusion in the context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

The author (Belinski et al. 2020) conducts a comprehensive evaluation of the literature, providing major results and highlighting gaps in understanding the link between organisational learning and Industry 4.0.

The study emphasises the critical role of learning in the effective adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies, emphasising the need for organisations to foster adaptive learning mechanisms to traverse the complexity of the industrial landscape. This literature review fits into the larger conversation about Industry 4.0 and organisational learning, tying together issues like technology integration, knowledge acquisition, and the transformational influence on industrial practices. 

2.2.4 Quality Integration in Project Life Cycles 

The incorporation of quality management concepts plays a critical role in structuring the project life cycle in the quest for project success. The author (Shyta, 2022) adds to this discussion by delving into the management ideas and practises involved in integrating quality across the project life cycle. The study goes into the complexities of guaranteeing quality at every level, giving project managers and practitioners useful insights.

This study highlights the dynamic interaction between quality management and the project life cycle, emphasising the importance of a complete strategy. The research investigates how incorporating quality concepts might improve project outcomes, emphasising the need to integrate project management practices with a commitment to quality standards.

In line with the prior study's emphasis on project success rates, this literature evaluation emphasises quality management in project execution. The previously provided study questions correlate with the author’s examination of management principles, which seeks to understand how quality is woven into the fabric of the project life cycle and how these principles may be leveraged for maximum project performance.

2.2.5 Quality Management in Engineering Construction Projects

The successful use of quality management systems in project contexts is a vital component of project success. This study contributes to the field by analysing the use of quality management rules, with a particular focus on the ISO 10006:2017 specification. The authors go into the actual application of quality management systems in real-world projects using a case study done in the Department of Engineering Construction.

According to the author’s (Jumaa et al., 2022) research, there were obstacles and accomplishments in using ISO 10006:2017 in a project setting. The case study gives insights into how the guidelines impact project quality management, providing practitioners and project managers with significant lessons.

To improve overall project performance, the study emphasises the need to align project practises with established quality standards. This research resonates with the examination of ISO 10006:2017 in the context of project quality management, which corresponds with the prior analysis' focus on quality integration. 

Also Read - Quality Management Assignment Help

2.2.6 Traditional vs. Agile Methodologies in Project Management Selection

For organisations looking to improve project success, the selection of project management approaches is at the forefront of strategic considerations. (Järvinen, 2023) investigates this essential decision-making process by analysing the selection criteria for project management strategies and comparing conventional and Agile methods.

The author’s goal in this investigation is to unearth the intricate issues that organisations must balance when picking between these two diverse methods. 

This work addresses the ongoing argument between conventional and Agile approaches, to provide clarity on the preferable option based on particular criteria. The research recognises the dynamism of projects and its influence on the selection of a suitable project management approach. The author contributes to the continuing discussion about optimising project management practises by comparing conventional and Agile methodologies.

2.2.7 Insights into Project Management Standards

In the realm of project management, standards operate as guiding principles by giving practitioners and companies a uniform framework. In-depth research on the applicability and consequences of project management standards is conducted by this author (Wolniak, 2022).

The study of project management standards conducted by the author aligns with the broader analysis of project management methodology and selection criteria. It is expected that the study can be investigate the crucial role that standards have in influencing decision-making processes related to project management. By delving into this topic, the author offers insights into the effects that following established project management standards has on organisations. 

This study’s analysis of the literature and investigation of project management standards, which aims to determine how they affect organisational procedures and project success, are complementary. Using the insights from this study, this literature review advances the discussion on project management standards.

The review seeks to educate decision-makers about the value of upholding standards in project management by examining the themes that are probably covered in the author’s work. This can be helping to foster a thorough understanding of how these standards affect organisational practises and lead to successful project outcomes.

2.3 Theories and Model 

Project management is endless and employments an assortment of hypotheses and methodologies to assist professionals in overcoming challenges in venture arranging, execution, and completion. The Theory of Constraints (TOC) and the Project Life Cycle (PLC), two well-known extended administration speculations and systems, can be secured in this presentation. 

Project Life Cycle (PLC):

A foundational notion known as the Project Life Cycle offers an organised framework for comprehending the stages a project goes through from start to finish. Because it provides project managers and stakeholders with a clear roadmap, this model is generally accepted in the field of project management and ensures a methodical and structured approach to project execution (Ghosh et al., 2021).

Initiation, planning, execution, monitoring and controlling, and closing are the usual phases of a PLC. The unique tasks, deliverables, and milestones that each phase entails allow project managers to plan and manage resources, time, and scope more efficiently. The PLC’s cycle structure highlights how iterative projects are, enabling ongoing development and improvement.

  • Initiation Phase: The definition of the project's goals, parameters, and viability, this signifies its start. The project manager is chosen, and the roles and duties of the stakeholders are determined.

  • Planning Phase: This phase involves extensive planning that addresses issues including resource allocation, risk assessment, budgeting, scheduling, and scope specification (Durdyev et al., 2020). To help the project team, a thorough project plan is created.

  • Execution Phase: At this point, the project’s actual work is completed. Project managers concentrate on organising personnel and materials to carry out the project plan effectively. Throughout this stage, regular monitoring and communication are crucial.

  • Monitoring and Controlling Phase: Performance and progress are regularly evaluated in the project plan. To keep the project moving forward, difficulties are resolved, and adjustments are made as needed.

  • Closure Phase: During this phase, the project is formally finished with the fulfilment of deliverables, recording of lessons learned, and resource release (Denicol et al., 2020). To assess project performance, a final evaluation is carried out.

Theory of Constraints (TOC):

A management theory called the Theory of Constraints concentrates on locating and removing obstacles or bottlenecks in a system. Although it was first used in manufacturing, TOC is now widely used in project management as a comprehensive strategy for enhancing system performance as a whole.

Key Concepts of TOC:

  • Identifying Constraints: Finding constraints—that is, components of a system that reduce its performance—is the first step in the TOC process. Resources, procedures, or other elements that obstruct the flow of work can all serve as constraints.

  • Exploiting Constraints: The next stage is to fully use the limits when they have been discovered (Errida et al., 2021). This entails optimising the utilisation of the system’s constrained resources to raise overall throughput.

  • Subordinating Non-Constraints:  Constraints take precedence over non-constraint items. This infers that in arrange to maintain a strategic distance from creating as much work that's incapable of being taken care of viably, the speed of non-constraints is controlled to coordinate the rate of limitations. 

  • Elevating Constraints: If the organization’s current resources aren’t allowing restrictions to be completely used, they could think about raising constraints by making investments in new technologies or capacity (Tam et al., 2020).

  • Avoiding Inertia: Organisations are urged by TOC to avoid investing needlessly in non-constraint resources to avoid lethargy. Rather, resources and efforts are focused on resolving restrictions and enhancing their performance.

Application of TOC in Project Management:

Constraints in project management can take many different forms, including scarce resources, interdependencies, and workflow bottlenecks. The application of TOC includes:

  • Identifying Critical Paths: Project schedules with identified critical routes can be used to identify locations where limitations could affect how long a project takes to complete (Armenia et al., 2019). After that, efforts may be focused on efficiently controlling these crucial pathways.

  • Resource Management: TOC places a strong emphasis on effective resource management, making sure that limitations are prioritised. This might entail redistributing resources or adding more capability for important jobs.

  • Project Buffering: To protect against unforeseen circumstances and probable delays, TOC recommends using project buffers (Stanitsas et al., 2021). Strategically positioned buffers allow for the absorption of variances without compromising the project’s timeline at crucial moments.

  • Continuous Improvement: TOC encourages a culture of continuous development by requiring project teams to review constraints and identify opportunities for improvement regularly. This is compatible with the iterative strategy of project management.

  • Integration of PLC and TOC: Although PLC provides a thorough foundation for project management, the addition of TOC stresses the identification and control of limitations, which adds a strategic element (Martinsuo et al., 2020). Early on in the project life cycle, project managers may identify restrictions, which helps them make well-informed decisions, allocate resources effectively, and reduce risks.

The fundamental ideas and models of project management are the Theory of Constraints and the Project Life Cycle. The PLC guides practitioners through discrete phases of project execution in an organised and iterative manner (Ahmadabadi et al., 2019).

Conversely, TOC provides a strategic viewpoint, emphasising the identification and management of limitations to improve system performance as a whole. The integration of these models yields a comprehensive comprehension and methodology for project management, guaranteeing equilibrium between methodical implementation and tactical adjustment to limitations, culminating in the triumph of the project.

2.4 Literature gap 

The relationship between innovation, business success, and the Lean-Agile Project Management Office (LAPMO) in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMBs) is examined in the study done by (Zare Khafri et al., 2023).

Although previous studies have focused on the effects of innovation and Agile project management, specifically LAPMO, on their own, there is a significant research vacuum concerning the detailed examination of how these elements work together to enhance performance in small and medium-sized businesses.

A large portion of the corpus of current research offers insights into the distinct domains of innovation and Agile techniques, but it falls short of thoroughly examining their combined impact on business performance, particularly in light of the particular possibilities and restrictions that SMBs face. 

There are intriguing prospects for more research projects given the discovered gap in the literature. To understand the dynamic interaction between these crucial components, research on the integration of innovation projects with Agile methodologies—more especially, LAPMO—is first and foremost necessary.

Setting such a study in the context of the SMB ecosystem would provide specifically targeted insights into how settings with limited resources might strategically use LAPMO to increase the impact of innovation on business success. 

Furthermore, studies concentrating on LAPMO’s mediating function could probe more deeply into the particular processes by which LAPMO helps to align innovation strategies with project management in general, offering a detailed comprehension of how this mediation improves performance outcomes. To get a deeper knowledge of the long-term consequences of integrated innovation and Agile techniques for small and medium-sized businesses, future studies might potentially use longitudinal approaches to evaluate the ongoing effects of these practices over prolonged timeframes.

2.5 Conceptual framework

conceptual framework

Figure 1: Conceptual framework
(Sources: Self-created)

2.6 Conclusion 

A thorough examination of many project management publications and research indicates a dynamic and changing field influenced by many ideas, models, and techniques. The investigation started with a comparison of Agile project management and ISO 10006 in the manufacturing industry, highlighting the necessity for a fair assessment of their benefits and limitations.

The literature study that followed focused on certain publications and included insights from different research, each offering a distinct viewpoint on Industry 4.0, organisational learning, Agile techniques, and quality integration.

The knowledge of organised project execution and strategic constraint management was further enhanced by the two well-known project management theories, the Theory of Constraints (TOC) and the Project Life Cycle (PLC) (Lalmi et al., 2021).

The combination of these models highlights how complimentary their responsibilities are in promoting effective project results, highlighting the iterative nature of projects and the significance of identifying and resolving obstacles.

Furthermore, the literature gap analysis indicated a noteworthy prospect for additional investigation concerning the amalgamation of Agile techniques, specifically LAPMO, with innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMBs). This gap indicates that further research is needed to fully understand how these elements work together and improve business success while taking into account the particular possibilities and difficulties that the SMB setting presents.

The combination of these assessments highlights the complexity of project management overall. It highlights how crucial it is to strike a balance between traditional and Agile techniques, integrate ideas like PLC and TOC, and investigate uncharted territory like the relationship between LAPMO, innovation, and SMB success.

This thorough understanding offers a strong basis for strategic planning, informed decision-making, and ongoing development in the always-changing field of project management techniques as organisations traverse the complexity of project management.



3.1 Introduction

Using ISO 10006 and agile project management techniques combined in this research is intended to increase the success rate of projects in the corporate environment. The research goes into considerable detail into the various approaches to project management, particularly regarding how well ISO 10006 and Agility function together and if they are appropriate.

Participants in the research represented a diverse variety of company personnel. They provided important advice on how to utilize and modify these project management frameworks. The research plan follows tight and well-organized standards, and it collects a large amount of data using techniques that are qualitative as well as quantitative. This research made use of several instruments for project management as well as knowledge of ISO 10006 and Agile techniques.

A full examination of methods for managing projects is part of the procedure, with an emphasis on how ISO 10006 and Agile concepts might be combined. The most essential aspect of the research is social concerns. The privacy and authorization of participants must be respected, and the research must adhere to the ethical standards established by the appropriate boards of institutional review.

This section of the methodology for the study tries to provide a concise and accurate image of the study's arrangement, materials, techniques, and ethical considerations by completing all of the above data in one single line. This is going to render the research more open and repeatable, which is critical for higher rates of project achievement in the rapid manufacturing industry.

3.2 Participants

For this study, the researchers gathered a convenient sample of 200 industrial workers who were actively engaged in project management responsibilities. Members were enrolled in view of their accessibility and ability to partake in the examination. Reaching out to professionals in the manufacturing field through online project management platforms, industry forums, and seminars comprised the recruitment strategy (Woźniak, 2021).

To fortify the possibility to be extrapolated of the information, the review included a different range of experts from numerous modern areas. There was a total of 200 participants in the study, with 100 people in each treatment category (Bartek and Olsson, 2021). To ensure that both groups had equal demographics and industry experience, the participants were chosen at random to participate in either the ISO 10006 or Agile project management methodologies. 

People with differed instructive foundations, quite those in business, designing, and partnered regions, framed the cooperation bunch. This variation was thought to be important to show how experts with different educational backgrounds may have different perspectives on project management (Nagyová et al. 2021). In addition, the characteristics of the industrial sector necessitate an integrated strategy, making it essential to accommodate employees with varying educational backgrounds.

Respondents in the overview were roused to participate in the review since it was pertinent to their expert positions. They get paid for their work; rather, they volunteered to help the manufacturing industry develop project management procedures. Participants' engagement was driven largely by their passion to professional advancement and a similar aim in enhancing project success rates in their field.

Participants varied in age from 25 to 55 years old, with an average age of 38 and a standard deviation of 7. This age distribution mirrored the range of age groups commonly observed in managerial jobs in the industrial business (Shyta, 2022). The sample contained a balanced gender divide with 50% of the participants being men and 50% female people.

Furthermore, specialists from various hierarchical levels within manufacturing businesses, spanning from project managers to team leaders, were included in the sample, providing a comprehensive view on the effect of management of projects techniques across distinct organizational positions.

To achieve cross-sectional coverage, the research drew a convenient sample of 50 manufacturing sector experts from a range of sources (Kalaiarasan, 2022). The participants were separated into ISO 10006 or Agile project management groups to demonstrate how varied the manufacturing company was in terms of age, gender, and educational backgrounds.

Their deliberate coordinated effort was prompted by a common objective behind assisting the task's completion rates, demonstrating the examination's feasible pertinence to their professional atmosphere.

3.3 Design

In this correlation request, the specialist wishes to analyse the adequacy of coordinating ISO 10006 and Deft strategies for project the executives to upgrade the achievement pace of activities inside the assembling area (Swain and Pradhan, 2020). The study utilizes a hybrid design that incorporates both related and experiment components to comprehensively investigate the relationship between the chosen methodologies.

The factors that are not dependant in this study are the project's management methodologies, particularly ISO 10006 and Agile. These highlight the distinctive conditions under consideration to evaluate their effect on the rate of project accomplishment in the manufacturing sector (Jumaa and Khaleel, 2022).

The variable that is reliant is the project's completion %, which represents the criterion for measuring the effectiveness of the project administration approaches. The rate of attainment is a full statistic that incorporates characteristics that include completion on time, conformity to schedule, and total satisfaction of stakeholders.

To give a thorough analysis, the study involves many groups that are both experimental and control. The organizations conducting experiments are those firms or projects that implement in two ways the International Standards Organization (ISO) 10006 or Agile strategy independently (Janhunen, 2022). The group of control, on the other hand, includes of initiatives which use standard project management techniques without adding ISO 10006 or Agile methodologies.

The allocation of people to categories is done by a comprehensive and random selection technique to assure that the groups are comparable from the outset. Random assignment decreases probable bias and increases the internal trustworthiness of the study (Swanepoel, 2021). Throughout the groups participating in the trial, participants are further split based on essential project characteristics to account for any confounding influences.

The design of this study comprises both between-subject and inside-subjects. The between-subjects element comprises comparing the outcomes of projects implementing ISO 10006 to those applying Agile methodologies. 

The inside-subjects component studies differences in the success of projects within the same company or project concurrently migrating from traditional management of projects to the alternative ISO 10006 or Agile approaches. The connected component of the design comprises examining the relationship among dedication to ISO 10006 or the principles of Agile and success rates for projects (Buganova & Simickova, 2020).

This component gives for a better information about how a project's degree of achievement or dedication interacts with the quantity of project success. The general design utilized in this comparison study fits with the semi-experimental approach, as it incorporates the adjustment of the variable that is independent choice of managing projects style without complete supervision over all additional variables (Delbari et al. 2022).

This strategy permits for a realistic evaluation of the integration of ISO 10006 and Agile techniques in genuine challenges industrial operations. The investigation's combined design comprises both related and experiment components to totally study the effect of ISO 10006 and Agile management approaches on the rate of project success in the industry of manufacturing. This approach permits the investigation of the two categories of across-subjects and inside-subjects variables.

3.4 Materials

In conducting a comparison investigation on ISO 10006 and the implementation of Agile Project Management within the production sector, the materials employed for gathering and analysing information play a key role in assuring the accuracy and dependability of the research results. This section covers the specifics of the materials utilized in the research, particularly questionnaires, stimulation, and other pertinent tools (Machado et al. 2023).

To examine the management of projects practices, the investigators presented standardized questionnaires based on known scales for measurement. One of the key instruments deployed was the ISO 10006 questionnaire, developed to assess conformity of projects to the ISO 10006 requirement in the administration of projects (du Plessis, 2022). This questionnaire comprised questions that examined several topics which included organizing a project, interactions, and risk management. Each issue prompted participants to offer comments on a Likert scale that ranged from strongly disapproving to strongly concurring.

In tandem, the Agile management of projects questionnaire was deployed, integrating elements taken from the Agile Protocol concepts and Agile practices. Participants were invited to indicate whether they agreed or disagreed with phrases pertaining to iterative development, teamwork, and flexibility (Wang and Cheng, 2022). The questionnaire had a specified number of questions, with answers documented on the scale of Likert.

The researchers also used qualitative aspects, notably deep conversations with managers of projects and members of the team from manufacturing organizations. Examples of questions from the conversations focused on obtaining insights into the actual use of ISO 10006 and Agile techniques within the sector. Open-ended questionnaires seek to capture subtleties in management of projects experiences, problems, and triumphs (Cruz Villazón, 2022).

Along with the responses to the inquiries from interviews, the research incorporated stimuli appropriate to the industrial situation. For instance, while studying memory within a research environment, a list of management-related difficulties or situations associated with manufacturing projects was shown to participants. 

The stimulus also contained project documentation templates matched with both ISO 10006 and Agile approaches. These sample documents were used to test participants' knowledge and preferences for specific project documentation formats (Ramos Steiner, 2020). For accessibility and replication, or the situation the entire questionnaires, inquiries from interviews, and stimuli are supplied in the supplements of this study.

The surveys include comprehensive details on the measures tested, the number of questions, answer possibilities, and essential reliability and validity data. Moreover, the appendices provide the whole set of stimulation and questions for interviews, ensuring that subsequent investigators may duplicate and develop upon this work (Buganová and Šimíčková, 2019).

The resources included in this comparative research were rigorously selected to represent each of the qualitative and quantitative elements of project management methods in the manufacturing business. The incorporation of standard questionnaires, particular to an industry stimulus, and in-depth questions for interviews strengthens the level of detail and depth of the data gathered, adding further to the reliability of the study conclusions [Referred to Appendix 1].

3.5 Procedure

Those who participated in the comparative examination of the International Standards Organization 10006 and the Agile Project Management methodology were escorted into the investigation establishment, and there they were presented with a full description of the study. A data sheet and permission form were delivered to each participant, describing the goal of the study and receiving their informed agreement to participate (Edsvik, 2020).

The people who participated were clearly told that the research sought to explore and compare the efficacy of ISO 10006 and the Agile approach in boosting the number of successful projects within the manufacturing sector (Flanagan and Jewell, 2019). Upon receiving informed permission, the subjects were provided with an initial information session to acquaint them regarding the purpose of the research.

They were educated about the historical framework of the research and promised that their anonymity and security would be rigorously preserved throughout the procedure (Gkeka, 2019).

The research opened with a preliminary assessment questionnaire meant to obtain preliminary data on the participants' understanding and expertise in project management, specifically in the setting of ISO 10006 and Agile techniques. This phase aims to assure uniformity among participants and build a framework for comparative analysis.

Subsequently, individuals were separated into two separate groups, each educated to a distinct project administration technique - a particular group concentrating on ISO 10006 and another focused on the use of Agile Project Management. The sequence of being exposed was chosen at random to reduce any sequencing effects. Each group got a set of vocal instructions supported by this study which detailing the concepts, procedures, and important components of the particular project management approach.

Participants participated in an actual assignment where they implemented the ideas taught to a simulated project situation within the manufacturing industry (Schultz, 2021). The time spent by each participant completing this activity was recorded to measure the effectiveness and flexibility of each strategy. Timings were crucial in establishing the feasibility of execution within an actual project scenario.

Following finishing of the practice physical activity, participants did an extra questionnaire that evaluated the immediate influence of the classroom teaching on their understanding and execution of the project's management techniques (Farrukh and Sajjad, 2023). This review aims to analyse the usefulness of each approach in promoting transfer of information and skill development.

Following the primary research operations, a debriefing session was planned, during which participants were educated about the study's goals, hypotheses, and general purpose of comparing ISO 10006 with Agile Project Management (Pawliczek et al. 2022). Any worries or issues expressed by respondents were addressed, ensuring that they were fully informed of their engagement in the study.

Respondents were handed information sheets and permission forms again during debriefing, giving them the chance to review the study specifics and ask clarification. The importance of how they supported venture the board procedures in the assembly organization was emphasized (Iivarinen, 2022).

The research used a planned and controlled methodology, allowing for a thorough comprehension of the reactions from the beginning to the end of their engagement. The data collected, whether qualitative or quantitative, is intended to provide significant insights to the ongoing discussion about project management strategies in manufacturing businesses.

3.6 Ethics

The methodological design of the comparative study among ISO 10006 and Agility Project Administration, aimed at raising project completion rates in the manufacturing sector, incorporates a rigorous framework according to ethical considerations (Nakhleh, 2019). In conformity with ethical principles, the study prioritizes anonymity, separation from involvement, and informed consent to preserve the well-being and autonomy of those who participated.

The exploration, first and foremost, group understands the indispensable prerequisite of keeping up with the secrecy of the members. To save their obscurity, all data obtained would be treated with the strictest mystery (Antonio, 2022). Individual characters can be subbed by unambiguous guidelines, and all that may possibly reveal the personalities of people taking an interest can be safely put away and available just to the picked scientists. This security is significant to protect respondents from any unexpected effects that might rise up out of the revelation of private information.

Besides, the review centres explicitly around the suitable decision to leave for people who partook. It is made very plain to them, both vocally and in text, that their contribution in the review is totally elective (Kärki, 2023).

Members have the choice to stop their contribution from the review whenever without confronting any punishment. This thoughtfulness regarding the opportunity to pull out underlines the examiner's regard of the autonomy and dynamic limits of the people, ensuring that their commitment depends on genuine assent instead of pressure.

Assent from informed people is a premise of moral examination, and this request is the same. Members can be given with intensive data about the review points, strategies, potential dangers, and benefits preceding when they choose to give their assent (Kovtun and Finohenova, 2021).

The consent structure can be ready in handily perceived language obtaining, giving that those marking it understand totally what is expected of them. Specialists can be available to address any questions or concerns voiced by members, offering a transparent contacts channel during the exploration system.

Likewise, the exploration is centred to straightforwardness around the usage of information. Respondents can be educated on how the data they submit can be procured, handled, and surveyed (Hutchison, 2022). The examination group can be adjusted to information insurance necessities, ensuring that the data is safeguarded safely and simply open to approved faculty. The discoveries can be conveyed in a solidified and anonymized design, saving the character of individual members.

The methodological framework of the comparative study demonstrates an inclusion of ethical problems. By emphasizing anonymity, the freedom from involvement, and informed consent, the research team promises that the study respects the standards of respect, social and justice (Mkhize, 2022).

These ethical precautions not only safeguard people participating but also aid to the general trustworthiness and dependability of the study in examining the usefulness of integrated procedures in the administration of projects within the industry of manufacturing.

3.7 Summary

In this study of comparison, the combination of the International Organization for Standard 10006 and Agile management of projects approaches is studied to boost the success of projects in the manufacturing business. The study approach includes a broad sample of 200 industry personnel who participate in managing project tasks. Participants were recruited using online management of projects platforms, professional discussions, and workshops to guarantee a wide presence across diverse sectors of industry.

The research intends to examine the efficacy of ISO 10006 and Agile approaches by randomly distributing participants to either methodology, with 100 persons in each treatment group. The individuals taking part, including managers of projects to team leaders, reflect various educational levels and demographic distributions. A typical age is 38, representing the normal age groupings found in management posts within the manufacturing industry. 

The study design involves a hybrid methodology, integrating related and empirical elements to completely investigate the link among ISO 10006 along with Agile methodologies and the success rates of projects.

The research utilizes both between-subject and throughout-subjects analysis, contrasting initiatives using ISO 10006 versus those employing Agile approaches and analysing changes inside identical projects as they shift from traditional to alternative methodology. To acquire data, the researchers employed standardized surveys for ISO 10006 and Agile techniques, deep interviews, and specific to an industry stimulation. 

The resources were rigorously chosen to provide an in-depth understanding of both the quantitative and qualitative elements of project management procedures. Ethical issues are crucial, stressing participant anonymity, voluntary engagement, and informed consent.

The study ensures openness in data utilization and complies to data protection regulations, promoting the health and independence of participants. This research provides useful insights to the continuing conversation on project management practices in the manufacturing business, covering both practical as well as ethical issues.



4.1. Introduction

This study utilities several statistical analyses to understand the intricacies involved in blending agile project management and ISO 10006 strategies. Whereas regression analysis is a method for prediction of factors and Chi square test demonstrates associations of categorical variables and descriptive statistics throw light on response distributions (Jumaa et al., 2022).

Forward ANOVA looks at differences between groups, t-test identifies difference of means among groups, and relationship analysis helps to assess relations between variables. By having a comprehensive approach, it will be possible to see what the experts think about the issues inside the project management systems.

Hypothesis 1: There is a significance between the extent to which a company maintains the key principles and components of the ISO 10006 project management methodology and perceived project success rates.

4.2. DESCRIPTIVES OF Independent Variables

The success of an organisation’s projects is highly dependent on project management methodologies including ISO 10006 and Agile Project Management. This survey-based analysis digs deep into how professionally people understand/operate in following the ISO 10006 principles. Furthermore, it considers incorporation of Agile methodologies. The participants’ views are analysed in depth using descriptive statistics.

The study starts with questions concerning compatibility with ISO 10006, which shows modest average conformity of 2.68, with significant differentiation (1.025 for standard deviation). Participants also show a slightly more assertion that there is some difference between agile and ISO 10006 with varied experiences (Mean = 2.86 and Standard Deviation of =1.108, respectively).

Respondents agree moderately with regards to facing challenges (Mean = 2.58) and agree more consistently when identifying opportunities often (Mean = 2.86). These practices lead to an average consensus (Mean = 2.58) with regard to conformity and uniformity among the other managers (Villar‐Fidalgo et al., 2019). The adoption of ISO 10006 and Agile practices is explored, and respondents expressed optimistic views on how these methods will capitalize on strengths when used in unison but diverged with regard to specific aspects. Likewise, the strength of agreement with regards to potential positives for helping eliminate managerial shortcomings stands at two point five with minor variance or a standard deviation of 0.827.

Respondents agree in an average way (M=2.77) on the effect of this on the project success rates, with respondents showing wide variations among them (S=1020). Integrated model for opinion on resource allocation efficiency in manufacturing projects (Mean = 2.82, SD = 1.214). These provide useful insights into what people think as they highlight areas of agreement and conflict. Standard deviations call for a delicate understanding, while mean values offer an average point of view at first glance.

The analysis helps build the awareness of the current project management practices within a professional world and provides a platform for subsequent studies and application of the project management methods in the rapidly changing world of projects.

Table 1 :Descriptives of Independent Variables
independant variables table

independent variables

independent variable

4.3. DESCRIPTIVES OF Dependent variables

The project management methodologies are crucial frameworks that affect the direction and success of organizational projects. This integrational analysis takes a look into how the ISO 10006 Agile project management may affect resource allocation in the course of manufacturing projects using data collected from surveyed respondents in a sample of sixty-six professional experts. The mean response of 2.82 indicates mild agreement on the positive influence of the integration, however no information on variations is included in the given description of the statistical findings.

With a sample of 66, it is possible to say that the viewpoint spanned reasonable diversity. Participants indicated their level of agreement/disagreement using a scale ranging from 1-6 (Zare Khafri et al., 2023). This implies that manufacturers integrate ISO 10006 and Agile Project Management improve resource allocation. Further, the mean score of 2.82 indicates average views about the suitability of ISO 10006 and agility for manufactures’ projects. Nonetheless, depending only on the mean can hide the variety of answers that exist in the sample.

The absence of a standard deviation is critical as it is an important measure of dispersion that allows for understanding the extent to which there has been divergence and convergence in opinions. Firstly, a higher standard deviation would indicate a larger spread of responses thus different views as compared to a lower standard deviation that signifies less difference among individuals’ opinions. This step emphasises the importance of careful interpretation of the mean since it may not be representative of the spread of the responses.

The differences in opinion concerning the integration could result from the complex nature of merging ISO 10006 and Agile techniques. As a result, perceptions vary because of different organizational or project contexts as well as personal experiences. There are various respondents who could realize beneficial results including an improvement in utilization of resources or others might experience problems or insignificant effects.

In order to have a clear understanding of different views and positions, there is need to undertake an analysis on factors affecting resource allocation efficiency. The possible variables include organizational culture, project complexity, team dynamics, as well as level of integration methodologies adoption and implementation. Further exploration could be done on each factor for further clarification about how the integration affected the issues.

Nonetheless, this study offers some realistic suggestions that can be useful in most organizations. By considering different environmental variables including cultural issues, as well as different viewpoints about a particular project’s impact or goal, organizations are able to plan accordingly. The specific approach aims at providing an effective integration process since it considers the complexities surrounding resources allocation in manufacturing projects.

In conclusion, the integration of ISO 10006 and Agile Project Management in manufacturing projects evokes a range of opinions among professionals (Kalaiarasan 2022). While the mean response provides an average perspective, the absence of the standard deviation highlights the necessity for a nuanced understanding of the dispersion in responses.

Further research, incorporating a more detailed analysis of influencing factors and a broader dataset, is essential for a comprehensive exploration of the impact of integrated methodologies on resource allocation efficiency. As organizations navigate the complexities of project management, embracing a holistic understanding of diverse perspectives becomes paramount for informed decision-making and successful implementation strategies.

Table 2 :Descriptives Of DV
Hypothesis 2: There is a significant difference in perceptions between individuals who strongly agree and those who strongly disagree with the statement: "I have experienced significant differences between Agile Project Management principles and ISO 10006."


Methods integration is one of the most relevant aspects in project management today since most organisations are trying to streamline their operations. This paper analyses in detail, on the use of chi-square test as a statistic method for relating the views expressed by the respondents with the categorical variants. Specifically, explore the significance of professionals' agreement or disagreement with the statement: ISO 10006 and agile project management methods help in enhancing efficiency in resource allocations for manufacturing projects.

Chi-Square Test Overview:

Chi-square is also an important instrument with which we can question relationships of categorical variables. In this sense, the dichotomous or categorical variable refers to respondents’ opinions about the integration statement. This test explains if any major relationship exists between these considerations with the categorical variables highlighting the statistical meaning.

Test Results:

The analysis yielded two key statistics: the Pearson Chi-Square, and the Likelihood Ratio. The test statistic amounted to 10.364 and was valid for 5 DF. These values show how much the observed frequencies deviate from the ones that were anticipated hence revealing something about the association examined.

The critical thing is that the Asymptotic Significance or p-value will be essential for finding out the statistical significance of the chi-square test. The results were close to a significance level of .05 with the associated p-value at .066. listed worksheet function has been applied and the output is shown in the screenshot below. Although it does not strictly meet this threshold, however trend toward significance calls for more investigation and scrutiny.

Expected Counts and Valid Cases:

It is notable that more than 75% of the cells have expected counts less than 5 and the lowest expected count being .02 in the study. This serves as an indication of the possible disadvantages arising from low frequencies that should be considered when interpreting results. In this case, there are 66 valid cases, which can be considered as quite an adequate basis for drawing those conclusions.

Potential Interpretations and Implications:

According to the statistics, there appears to be an evident connection between the perspectives of the respondents and the categorical variables, however this connection is not the same as being statistically significant. The phenomenon requires deep reflection and may invite possible justifications that account for its occurrence. This makes one pause to ponder upon the complexities behind how the professionals define the influence of combining ISO 10006 and Agile techniques over resources distribution within the manufacturing plans.

Reporting of expected counts that are less than five points out the need for identifying situations where the results are likely unreliable as a result of small, expected frequencies. Despite being very helpful, these limitations reveal why it is necessary to be careful about interpreting results and what next.

Chi-square offers an important window to look at the statistical lines of sight in industry’s point of views concerning ISO 10006 and the agile integration into manufacturing resource allocation. Although nonsignificant, these findings raise issues for further discussions to be had about the study (Mkhize, 2022).

By comprehending the statistic idiosyncrasies inherent in professional opinions, organizations can make better decisions as they seek to improve on their project management approach. This analysis leads us to ponder much further on the intricacies involved in integrating the methodologies towards more fruitful results with regard to the project management in ever changing manufacturing situations.

Table 3 :Chi-Square

Chi-Square Test Overview:

Chi- square test is an efficient statistical instrument used to determine connections among categorical variables. The categorical variables include their views on ISO 10006 principles as well as whether they agreed with the integration statement. This test examines whether there is a significant relationship among these variables and gives us an insight into their statistical relationship.

The chi-square test yielded two key statistics: Pearson Chi-square and the Likelihood ratio. The two statistics displayed convincing results as evidenced by Pearson Chi-Square value of 113.582 and Likelihood Ratio value of 45.497. Both had the same number of degrees of freedom at 25. These statistics act as indices for measuring the size of differential frequency between the expected and actual frequencies of the contingency table.

Critically, one needs to take note that the chi square test is as good as its p-value popularly referred to the asymptotic significance. With respect to the Pearson Chi-Square, the p-value comes out at 0.000, whereas that of the Likelihood ratio is .07. The low p-values below the conventional significance level of 0.5 show that such association is significant.

Expected Counts and Valid Cases:

It is also important to note that 86.1% of the cells contain expected counts lower than 5 with the lowest expected count being as small as .02. It implies that there would be possible complications arising from low expected frequencies and should be careful about interpreting the outcomes. Underlining the strength of the statistical analysis based on the sample of 66 valid cases.

Potential Interpretations and Implications:

This shows that the statistically significant findings support an assertion of linkage between viewpoints with regard to the integration statement, and perceptions with reference to conformity of companies to the ISO 10006 model principles. This means that there are professionals out there who either support or oppose the integration statement, thereby have varying views with regards to whether the organization is committed to ISO 10006. Chi-square test provides meaningful understanding of the complex relations between professionals’ views on integrated ISO 10006 vs. Agile PM and their thoughts about conformance to ISO 10006. Statistically significant results indicate that there is a strong connection among these variables and are suggestive of an interaction among them.


Table 4 :Chi-Square-2

The relationship between ISO 10006 and Agile Project Management in allocating resources and achieving efficient work performance while managing projects in today’s intricate business environment has drawn some interests among professionals. Using chi-square tests, the analysis explores practitioners’ attitudes towards integrated practice, revealing key aspects of integration complexity.

Chi-Square Test 1 - Resource Allocation Perspectives:

The chi-square value of this statement shows that the respondents feel that the integrators can be more effective in their resource allocations. This involved Pearson Chi-Square value of 131.029, with 25 degrees of freedom (p < .005) and Likelihood Ratio value of 66.587, also with 25 degrees of freedom and highly. The relationship shows that the respondent’s opinion about resource allocation has been strong link with integration of ISO 10006 and Agile methodologies (Gkeka, 2019).

These high significances suggest that the observed differences did not occur by chance. Low expected frequencies are indicated when expected counts are below five in 88.9% of cells. In spite of it, its statistical significance offers support for making inferences between respondents’ views on resource distribution and the use of multiple approaches.

Chi-Square Test 2 - Differences Between Agile and ISO 10006:

The other chi-squared tests explore whether there are any substantial variations about Agile Project Management tenets and ISO 10006 between the participants. Another, the Pearson Chi – square is significant at a level (p=.000) while the likelihood ratio is also significant at the same level (p=.000). This highlights a deep connection between the respondents’ experience of difference and their views on the integration. More than 86.1% of those expected counts are less than 5, hence making the findings questionable and necessitating a strict interpretation approach.

Chi-Square Test 3 - Work Effectiveness Impact:

Third, chi-square tests examine the correlation of the respondents’ views on the resources allocated due to integration with the views on their activities of work. The p-values obtained for these stats was .000. This suggests a close correlation between how respondents think about resource distribution and their perception of how ISO 10006 impacts their efficiency whilst employing agile methods. In 86.1%, the observed counts are below 5 indicating possible problems with the data.

Interpretation and Implications:

A repeated trend on how highly probable they were on the level P < 05 was observed with respect to each of the three Chi square tests carried out. It appears that there is harmony within the professions’ perceptions concerning allocation of resources, difference in methodological orientations, and effects on work effectiveness.

A complex relationship in the view of professional’s perspective relating ISO 10006 with Agile methods is shown by chi-square analysis (Gordwin 2021). By indicating statistical significance, these three issues are linked together.

Through this study, it therefore contributes important contributions supporting the decision-making process in optimizing methods for organizational project management while simultaneously provoking additional explorations on the intricacies associated with such integrative practices.

Table 5 :Chi-Square Test-3
Hypothesis 3: The perceived effectiveness of work activities when implementing Agile methodologies in projects is significantly influenced by the extent to which individuals agree with the statement: "The ISO 10006 methodology significantly impacts the effectiveness of my work activities."

4.5. T-TEST

The idea that ISO 10006 regarding project management is incorporated in an Agile way has become prevalent. This integration is a serious issue for professionals who attempt to improve efficiency and success results. The results of this analysis are based on survey data and involve the use of one-sample t-tests to establish whether these mean opinions are statistically significant. Explore how Agile aligns with ISO 10006 principles within resource allocation and project success in professionals’ perspective based in the UK.

Survey Response Overview:

The survey had six statements that formed a quantitative basis for expressing professional’ agreement or disagreement with statement connected with integration. Firstly, descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation and standard error of the mean helped in presenting an idea about the distribution of opinion scores. A balanced point of view among respondents is indicated by moderate mean scores that range from 2.58 to 2.86.

Statistical Significance Unveiled:

One sample t-tests also highlighted statistically significant difference in means with 0 as a neutral reference point. In all cases, these t-values and p-values (.000) signpost a marked deviation from nullity (Vaštakaitė,2022). This statistically significant value underscores the strength and uniformity of these opinions among this sample population of professionals. Interpreting Specific Statements:

Resource Allocation Efficiency: The large t statistic of 18.857 confirms the importance of the integrations’ anticipated benefits in relation to project resource allocation within manufacturing operations.

Positive Impact on Project Success: As such, the t-value of 22.090 forwards the strong consent amongst respondents that, adoption of integrated approaches enhances project success rates.

Positive Implications for Leveraging Strengths: Respondents recognize the positive implications of using ISO 10006 and Agile methodologies simultaneously as they have a significant T-value of 22.007.

Challenging Issues in Managing Complexity: Interestingly, it has a huge t value of 21.758 which suggests that many professionals are very much aware of problems relating to complex project management.

Company's Maintenance of ISO 10006 Principles: A large t-value of 21.252 validates that the majority of respondents agree with their companies’ compliance to the basic ISO 10006 principles.
Significant Differences Between Agile and ISO 10006: The t-value of 21.000 shows unanimous opinion among professionals with regards the divergence between Agile Project Management principles and ISO 10006.

This study shows that a systematic combination of survey responses and a one-sample t test provides a clear picture of professional views about combining ISO 10006 and Agile approaches (Shevchenko et al. 2022). Intricate differences between project management and strategic integration also suggest critical considerations in selecting an optimal system that will not be subjected to frequent change. These results will act as compass for the managers during this project to make informed decisions and develop strategies in light of the changing PM landscapes.

Table 6: One-Sample Statistics
 one sample statistics

Table 7 :One Sample Test
one sample test

Hypothesis 4: Individuals who frequently encounter challenging issues while managing projects with a certain degree of complexity are more likely to perceive a positive impact on project success rates with the integration of ISO 10006 and Agile methodologies.


Project management is constantly changing, and among issues that are undergoing improvement at present is the use of methodologies like ISO 10006 and Agile where one can find higher efficiency and rate of success. Detailed analysis of a regression study using one-sample t-tests and statistical analysis for mean opinions. Discuss how professionals’ opinions concerning resource allocation, project success, and compatibility between Agile and ISO 10006 principles are related.

Model Summary:

As the first guide, the model summary helps the investigators find their way through professionals’ intricate views. With an R-square value of 0.347, one may conclude that about 34.7% of variability in response to the integration could be explained by the predictor variables under consideration.

This suggests that while the level of explanatory power is moderate, there are other influences not revealed in that study. Additionally, the ANOVA results support the viability of this model which has an F value of 8.116 and a significant p-value of 0.000. Thus, together, these predictors account for why respondents have differing views on integration of refugees.

Interpreting Specific Statements:

They give specific insights about the extent every predictor affects the dependent variable and hence illuminate the small details that are behind the action.

1. Adherence to ISO 10006 Principles:
• Positive correlation was observed between professionals’ agreement with ISO 10006 principles and favourability towards the level of integration (r = 0.293, p < 0.05). This implies, therefore, that good faith in adhering the prescribed PM principles helps paint a positive picture toward the integration.

2. Opportunities in Managing Projects with Scope:
• It is interesting to note that the number of times you encounter opportunities in project management of specified magnitude does not show statistical significance with regards to your opinion about the integration (the coefficient is 0.006 and p-value = 0.974). The implication is that professionals’ opinions about the integration are not affected by the size of their engagements.

3. Consistency in Management Practices:
• A significant factor that emerges is the perception of consistency in managerial practices. In particular, it has become important that the professionals associate a strong positive relation (= +0.362, p = .026) with the integration. This highlights the importance of uniformity on how professionals view things.

4. Positive Impact on Project Success Rates:
• However, perceived positive effects of combining ISO 10006 and Agile methodologies on total project success ratings is insignificant in its correlation to respondents’ attitudes toward the use of these methods together (p = 0.286). This means that regardless of the inherent worth of this influence may not be seen by the professional opinion.

Contextualizing the Results:

Although it provides a strong basis, the results need to be understood in the context of contemporary project management (Wright et al., 2018). These respondents’ mild mean views, ranging between 2.58 and 2.86, suggest an even-minded viewpoint. This variation shows that professionals come from different backgrounds that influence their beliefs.

Implications for Practice:

Therefore, practitioners and organization should take time and understand what these results imply towards improving their project management strategies. Adhering to ISO 10006 principles plus stability on side of managing practices shows that solid base and common view of procedure leads a lot to perception of merger.

However, the lack of significant effects for project scope and their influence on average project success rates indicates some areas where professionals might not view the integration as important. Therefore, there is need to be more delicate as far as selling the benefits and outcome associated with holistic approaches are concerned where necessary adjustments have to be made on misrepresentations or confusion points.

A comprehensive view about attitudes of professions towards joint implementation of ISO 10006 and Agile approaches emerges by means of analysis of regression results. Their significance is indicated through the statistical importance of certain other predictors.

On the contrary, some of them are not significant and as such, they can give information on areas where perception is not so much affected (Alixey, 2018 ). These results provide an indispensable help to organizations in making appropriate decisions towards their long-term vision.

Table 8 :Model Summary
model summary
Table 9 :ANOVA


Table 10 :Coefficients


Hypothesis 5: The integration of ISO 10006 and Agile Project Management methodologies has a positive correlation with enhanced team collaboration and communication in manufacturing project management, as indicated by the extent to which individuals agree with the corresponding statement.


Informed decision making in project management depends on how well one comprehends these connections. Using their own opinions concerning the relationship that lies between ISO 10006 and Agility, this correlation analysis gives evidence that project success and failure is influenced by factors such as resource allocation and exploitation of strengths, while threats are mitigated through weaknesses correction.

Resource Allocation Efficiency:

There is a highly significant positive correlation of p = 0.000 value, the coefficient of 0.562 between integrated ISO 10006 and Agile practice in relation with more resourceful management of manufacturing projects. It is evident that such a positive association between the perception and professional’s conviction about the contribution of the two methodologies in resource allocation efficiency will lead to their integration as an element of management practice.

Leveraging Strengths in Project Management:

A correlation of 0.485 (p = 0.00) supports the relationship of these two factors in relation to leveraging project team competencies. Similarly, professionals who see a strong integration will accept positive effects of combining the strengths that exist within ISO 10006 agile methodologies.

Opportunities and Scope Management:

A significant positive correlation with r of 0.322 and p value of .008, for frequently encountering opportunities was found regarding incorporation of techniques (Tonchia et al., 2018). It shows an affinity between the two in that it is likely that professionals will have come across several instances of projects with considerable scope and view them as integrated using these concepts.

Mitigating Management's Weaknesses:

A significant positive association of 0.513 (p-value = 0.000) suggests that the degree of integration is linked with positive implication of addressing weaknesses during project management. Therefore, such professions advocate for effective integration as a way of resolving deficiencies within the administration structure. A strong positive relationship between the integration and project success rates is evident by a correlation coefficient of 0.435 (p = 0.000). Professional perception of this strong integration indicates its positive impact on total project performance.

Maintenance of ISO 10006 Principles:

A correlation coefficient of 0.548 (p = 0.000) presents a strong relation between the integration and the extent to which professionals assume that their organization remains by the basic principles of the ISO 10006 approach. A high perceived integration therefore implies a view of conformance to ISO 10006 ideals as an inherent part of the organization’s operation.

Table 11 :Correlations

A detailed picture emerges from the correlation analysis about the relationships between different aspects of project management procedures. These strong correlations reveal that colleagues’ perspectives are interlinked.

Belief is stronger that more efficient resource allocation, leveraging of strengths, encountering of opportunities, mitigation of weaknesses, and increases in the success rate of a project are all associated with a strong integration of ISO 10006 and Agile methodologies.

The findings provide useful advice to organizations trying to develop efficient project management approaches in today’s complex world of project implementation.


Discovering differences among groups will require project management methodologies involving statistical analysis like One-Way ANOVA. Positive impacts of strengthening, avoiding weakness with management, sticking to some principles, exploiting opportunities and efficiency in resource allocation, considering professionals’ opinion about the combination of ISO 10006 with agility techniques.

Positive Implications for Leveraging Strengths:

There is high significance in the One-Way ANOVA conducted for professionals’ opinion of positive implications from using strengths (F = 7.790, p = 0.000). The disparities in opinions between the groups indicate that there is a diversity of thoughts concerning the effect of integrating strengths during project management. Positive Implications for Mitigating 

Management's Weaknesses:

Likewise, the ANOVA for the opinions about positive impacts of reducing weakness in management is also statistically significant (F=3.538, p=0.007). Statistically, there is disparity in reactions within such groups on the part that the integration was necessary for dealing with managerial weaknesses.

Maintenance of ISO 10006 Principles:

Another important result is provided by the ANOVA about the extent to which professionals perceive that their firm complies with the ISO/10006 values (F=3.142, p=0.014). The comparison between groups suggests that there are real differences in opinions on whether an organization should comply with ISO10006 principles as a result of this integration (du Plessis, 2022).

The One-Way ANOVA gives a significant number for the statement “usually come across chances when dealing with projects that are of somewhat large dimensions”. Such implies significant variations in the views of different sections with respect to how often opportunities are experienced in the combination of techniques.

Resource Allocation Efficiency:

Statistical ANOVA of the opinions on the enhanced resource efficiency through supply chain integration for manufacturing projects is very significant (F = 19.164; p = 0.000). It represents huge disparities between a number of groups as far as views on the usefulness of integrated-based resource distribution are concerned.

The findings from the One-Way ANOVA show how their opinions on the link between ISO 10006 and Agile can differ across professions’ groups. The fact that these highly significant results cut across multiple statements shows that these views are very distinct between the sampled demographics.

It is essential for organizations wanting to align their project management efforts to particular issues and sentiments relating to fusion.

Table 12 : ANOVA
anova table


A qualitative analysis of project management practices involved interviewing five participants. Each interviewee provided great insights into how agile techniques and the principles derived from ISO 1007 have been employed in their own project settings.

The participants were first asked to report on cases where the results of projects had been directly affected by these principles. The results indicate that in some instances, following the requirements of ISO 10006 greatly helped to make their initiative successful. The respondents attached great importance to the holy trinity of transparency, effective stakeholder participation and documentation; these are all core principles for implementation in accordance with ISO 10006. The disciplined approach laid out in

ISO 10006 was emphasized as one mean of overcoming these barriers, developing a risk-aware culture and helping ensure goals were reached that met the set quality standards. But in terms of implementation, the concern is that there may be inflexibility with ISO 10006; ever-changing project sites cause problems.
The following interview question focused on application of agile methods, exposing the variety of means by which they applied agile frameworks and practices.

Particularly, agile methodologies have become known for their ability to change as the project demands. Participants all stressed the importance of using Scrum, Kanban and Lean tools adapted specifically to a specific project environment.

In addition, the advantages of agile tools like Jira, Trello and DevOps that enable an iterative approach to development (iteration), increased visibility into workflows, and more efficient collaboration were recognized. The adoption of agile practices showed impressive results, such as quicker delivery times, greater responsiveness to consumer feedback and improved resilience in general.

Interview 1 Responses:

  1. Positive Influence of ISO 10006: In one such case, a software development project was strongly influenced by the principles of ISO 1006. To the extent possible, it conformed to a formal framework (ISO 10006) whereby communication happened, and stakeholders were built up. Regular project review and properly recorded processes were the keys to success.

    Such a strategy reduced risks, and also enabled the project to be completed on time. Excessive focus on communication and stressful structure was extremely important in stabilizing the roles of people involved with a project, creating an environment where everyone worked together.

  2. Negative Influence of ISO 10006: It is unfortunate to learn that in one construction project the team did not follow the principles of ISO 100O6, with negative results. Poor communication, misunderstandings that led to delays and increased costs all stemmed from lack of reference to the standards set by ISO 1006.

    The lessons of this experience made it especially apparent how important the principles set out in ISO 10006 are, particularly for Industries where communication is key to project success.

Interview 2 Responses:

  1. Positive Influence of ISO 10006: Quality management was crucial in one manufacturing project, where observance of the quality control standard known as ISO 10006 proved critical. The systematic method laid out in ISO 10006 helped to reduce defects and minimize rework, aiding the project outcome. This is proof of the effectiveness with quality projects of ISO 10006, which requires that project managers follow preestablished formats in handling each stage.

  2. Negative Influence of ISO 10006: These caused problems in the IT project, because they were not following ISO 10006. Poorly defined roles and responsibilities, plus an absence of a comprehensive communication strategy contributed to confusion, missed deadlines, and dissatisfaction on the part of clients. This shows how vital it is to follow the principles of ISO 10006, especially in cases like this that require a great deal of communication and arrangements.

Mixed Responses for Interview Question 2:

  1. Unfamiliar with ISO 10006: Another respondent was not aware of the existence of ISO 10006 but voiced a desire to study. This is at once a lack of knowledge and an encouraging willingness to accept new ideas.

  2. Inconsistent Agile Implementation: Yet another replied suggested that the group had transitioned to agile techniques by applying Kanban in a marketing setting. It also had a positive impact through better tracking of tasks, and improvement in the efficiency of projects. Nevertheless, another answer pointed out that agile implementation setbacks (including scope changes and delays) show the need for improvement in practices.




An analysis of experts’ views concerning the integration of ISO 10006 & agile project management techniques gives a lot to think about in relation to project management challenges.

A total of 66 professionals provided their insights into the varying viewpoints surrounding the effects of the integration on resource distribution during manufacturing project implementation. However, the lack of the standard deviation shows the variety of views by the members of the sample for moderateness in these mean responses.

However, professionals see substantial dissimilarities between ISO 10006 and agile methodology therefore this approach to integration needs adjustment. Complex projects present challenges, yet a project clearly defined scope open up opportunities. Strategic and change management for integrating the company calls for continuity of its management practices with a consideration for the expected benefits from such integration.

This emphasizes the need to have tailored integration arrangements, comprehensive training provisions, support systems for arising difficulties and focus on specific project scope. Effective integration involves consistency in implementing and managing change processes. Constant tracking and adjustment are crucial for maintaining realignment with organisational objectives.

The study provides directions for further research including intensive investigations, longitudinal studies, cross-industrial comparisons, and qualitative studies as well. Further, we should explore the role of integrated methodologies in the outcomes of projects and assess the effect of organizational context on the findings for more clarity.


As such, key findings in relation to the quantitative & qualitative analysis are provided below. In terms of the efficiency of resource allocation during production activities, most respondents indicated an averagely high degree of concurrence. Nevertheless, the diversity in answers shows that there are many different views about such a fusion among specialists.

Furthermore, the survey showed that many professionals see major discrepancies between ISO 10006 management systems and Agile approaches. This is an indication that there should be refined methods of incorporation considering the variances to have better integration.

Interviews also delved into the implementation of principles in ISO 10006 and agile methodology, discussing how they have been applied to actual projects. A thematic analysis reveals some answers, pointing out the positive and negative effects on project management.

ISO 10006 Influence:

Positive Impact: Stories of successful implementation of the principles from ISO 10006 can be found in cases where they were strictly followed. Finally, effective communication and stakeholder engagement in a software development project-for example through regular reviews of the progress on how things would work out-also played an important role. The same was true in a manufacturing job, where the use of ISO 10006 facilitated quality management and enabled defects and rework to be reduced.

Negative Impact: In contrast, when the principles of ISO 10006 were ignored, difficulties resulted. Not conforming to the requirements of ISO 1006 meant lacklustre communication, misunderstandings, and inflated project expenses. Since there was no systematic plan for communication and a deviation from this principle, these snags caused delays. This result emphasizes the dangers of neglecting Universal ISO 10006 Communication in Industries where they are most needed.

Thematic Insight: A thematic analysis of ISO 10006 highlights the need for various forms of communication, stakeholder participation and quality management. Ignoring these principles often results in project delays, difficulties and unexpected costs; the point being that there must be strict control over how a construction project is handled.

Agile Methodologies Influence:

Positive Impact: What is the impact of agile methodologies on organizations that adopt them? In one case, the Scrum approach and tools such as Jira improved cooperation between product management staff in a software environment that resulted not only catalysing creativity but also benefiting project delivery. Also, the implementation of Kanban in a marketing setting has shown that task control and efficiency can be enhanced through project management methodology; it gave ample evidence of agile responsiveness.

Challenges in Implementation: But difficulties appeared in organizations adopting agile practices. Substandard use of agile principles on an IT project led to scope shifts, deadlines not being met and customer dissatisfaction. In another instance, an organization was turning over a new leaf in attempting to implement agile but encountered obstacles owing to its rigid existing workflows and mentalities.

Thematic Insight: The thematic analysis highlights the dual character of agile approaches. When applied properly, they strengthen cooperation, flexibility and effectiveness. Yet one risk of transition and a loss of discipline is negative results, so it's essential that agile be introduced properly with an effective plan to implement its principles.

Overall Insights:

1.    Communication is Key: Communication is key to both ISO 10006 and the agile methodologies. They all share a common pattern in successful projects-communication plans, organized reviews, and shared methods.

2.    Discipline Matters: However, it's important to observe established standards--ISO 10006 or agile are equally valid mechanisms. Straying from these guidelines often brings confusion, missed schedules and client dissatisfaction.

3.    Flexibility vs. Rigidity: However, agile methodologies need appropriate discipline, or they will easily be accompanied by scope creep and delays. Structured but disciplined This is why we have adopted ISO 10006.

4.    Continuous Improvement: In fact, the organizations which are constantly optimizing their management of projects will find benefit regardless of whether they take up ISO 10006 or turn to agile methodologies.

5.   Positive Attitude towards Learning: Some principles, however, are unfamiliar such as ISO 1006 which can be dealt with positively. An attitude of open-mindedness to new ideas is evidence that one wants actively to get ahead in his career.


ISO 10006 integration in agile project management should be well thought out and modified appropriately. The recommendations are useful, providing a guide for practice and helping future studies to improve project management techniques in various organizations.

A study that examines the point of view of professionals, on the merger of ISO 10006 and Agile Project Management approaches, reveals numerous revelations about project management. A detailed picture emerges from the 66 professionals who responded in the survey about the perception of such integrated strategies and their involvement on the allocation of resources in the manufacturing ventures.

Even though the average response indicates the existence of moderate agreement, lack of the standard-deviation highlights cautious interpretation of opinions’ distribution among the sample (Jumaa et al., 2022).

The results underscore the difficulty of integration and show that professionals react differently towards ISO 10006 and Agile approaches. This inconsistency in replies suggests that the coordination process be undertaken knowing some difficulties on their way, taking into account different views of staff members towards such an enterprise.


These discoveries have wide-ranging consequences for businesses seeking to streamline their project management procedures. This moderate level of agreement as well as wide variations on response indicate that integrating ISO10006 and agile methodologies is no one size fit all solution.

However, organizations should acknowledge that customization is needed depending upon the respective organizational context, type of projects, including the team dynamics. Differentiated approaches emphasize the need for a holistic appreciation of the two Agile concepts. Professionals can easily embrace the integrated approach by providing training programs that involve building a bridge of knowledge across different frameworks.

Additionally, the incidences of problems encountered during running complex projects stress the need for institutional supports like resources that can help handle the difficulties. Organizations need to build a culture of collaborative and adaptable project management environment where obstacles are seen as an opportunity for improvement.

The survey indicated that most professions encounter conducive situations when dealing with projects with specific objectives. It signifies great need for transparent project goals and boundaries such that, professionals are able to locate and make use of the available opportunities in the right manner.

Another key implication is consistency in management practices. It is implied that if they agree somehow on ISO 10008 or other management members’ viewpoints, they will have to be aligned. A consistent way of applying the frameworks across management levels will ensure a unified approach to project management.

This calls for an appropriate strategy in terms of implementation so that these implications can take positive form. The organizations should therefore develop change management strategy whereby professionals understand the integration strategy; are skilled and have a set mind on proper execution of the new methods.


Based on the key findings and implications, several recommendations emerge for organizations seeking to enhance their project management practices through the integration of ISO 10006 and agile methodologies:

1. Customized Integration Plans: Make customized integration plans that take into account the peculiarities of organizational context, project characteristics, and team dynamics. Such universal strategies could be an unsuccessful option.

2. Training Programs: Introduce wide-ranging training schemes to fill the knowledge lacuna amidst ISO 10006 and agile precepts. Professionals will benefit from this hence allowing them to better engage in the integrated way.

3. Support Structures for Challenges: Put up an appropriate structure of resources for handling complex projects. They could adopt policies on staff development through mentoring groups, sharing platforms, and project management software.

4. Clear Project Scopes: Highlight the need for clear deliverables, project objectives, and enabling professionals to clearly understand and take advantage of opportunities.

5. Consistency in Application: Ensure uniformity in using ISO 10006 and agile approaches at different supervisory hierarchies. It gives an integrated project management environment.

6. Change Management Strategies: Consider investing in viable change management strategies to enhance an orderly embracement of the combined approaches and procedures. Examples of this include setting up a communication plan, initiating training programs, or creating constant feedback channels.

7. Continuous Monitoring and Adaptation: Set up systems for continued evaluation of the approach and create a culture of flexibility. Assessments are regularly done to spot areas of improvements and sustaining of relevancy of the business operations with the company objectives.


Current study creates a basis for professional views on the combination of ISO 10006 and Agile approaches (Zare Khafri, et al. 2023). However, there are avenues for future research to deepen our knowledge in this field:

1. In-Depth Analysis of Varied Opinions: Carry out more thorough analysis using the standard deviation and understand why there are different views among the sample. This may include qualitative research techniques like interviews or focus groups to grasp the complexities of professionals’ experiences.

2. Longitudinal Studies: Conduct longitudinal research into the long run effects of using the combined approaches on project results. Perhaps, this would shed light on perception sustainability and perceptual change across time.

3. Cross-Industry Comparisons: To enhance your understanding of how the integration is viewed across the various Industries, undertake cross-sectoral comparisons. The integrated approach might be effective; although, variations in organizational cultures and project types could affect this factor.

4. Exploration of Organizational Context: Examine how an organization context is driving the integration into success. There is also possibility for factors like company’s size, industry or organizational structure to determine how professional view things.

5. Qualitative Insights: Use qualitative research techniques to get in-depth information on how professionals view their experiences. These issues with quantitative data may better be understood qualitatively, in the context of other integrating factors.

6. Impact on Project Outcomes: Evaluate how the applied methodologies influenced project outcomes such as efficiency, economical, and satisfaction of stakeholders. Tangible outcomes of the project can provide a better evaluation framework.

Bringing together ISO 10006 and agile project management can be an arduous task which would need to accommodate certain organizational peculiarities. This research provides recommendations and implications that serve as a manual for organizations intending to better their project management.

Therefore, through future research efforts, we will be able to better understand project management in a dynamically organised environment and improve on the methodologies we currently use.


Top Management Samples

Airbus A380 Case Study Role Of Social Media In Business Administration And Brand Dynamics Impact Of Interactive Communication Technologies In Business
Orica Factory Chemical Leak Response Plan Introducing Midlevel Dentists in South Western Sydney PHN Safety And Health Assessment At Amazon Warehouse
Reflective assignment on why I took course at Torrens University Importance of CSR in Dogma business Applied Professional Practice For Event Manager
Applied professional practice ejournal for hospitality sector Strategic Event Tourism Management Barcelona Business Events In A Global Context
Quality Management Of Manfield Coating Case Study Impact Of Data Analysis On McDonald Research on Spousal Support and Work–Family Balance in Launching a Family Business
Consultancy Project for Beach Vibes Resort Financial Report Analysis Aramco Ethical Dilemma In Project Management
Analysis of Strategic Event Tourism in Dubai Project Management Frameworks For MTHL Innovation and Entrepreneurship Of Tesla
TikTok And Kuai Shou: A Tale Of Two Short-Video Sharing Apps From China To The Globe PESTLE analysis Coles Strategy Analysis - Strategic Management Assignment Sample
Organisational Change For DGBI Ltd. Apple Swot And Pestle Analysis Case Study Analysis of Apple Company Market Share Loss

References List

Ahmadabadi, A.A. and Heravi, G., 2019. The effect of critical success factors on project success in Public-Private Partnership projects: A case study of highway projects in Iran. Transport policy, 73, pp.152-161.
Alexey, S., 2018. Application of Management Accounting System to Marketing Projects Performance Evaluation: Aligning with Company’s Strategic Goals.
Antonio, W., 2022. The Nature of Project Management in South African SMEs: A Look at Insurtech in the Western Cape Province of South Africa (Master's thesis, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment).
Armenia, S., Dangelico, R.M., Nonino, F. and Pompei, A., 2019. Sustainable project management: A conceptualization-oriented review and a framework proposal for future studies. Sustainability, 11(9), p.2664.
Bartek, S. and Olsson, E., 2021. Construction quality: the challenges and keys to improvement: A multi-level, exexplorative stydy of the quality management practices in a large swedish construction company.
Belinski, R., Peixe, A.M., Frederico, G.F. and Garza-Reyes, J.A., 2020. Organizational learning and Industry 4.0: findings from a systematic literature review and research agenda. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(8), pp.2435-2457.
Bergmann, T., 2018. The Relationship between Agile Project Management and Project Success Outcomes.
Buganová, K. and Šimíčková, J., 2019. Risk management in traditional and agile project management. Transportation Research Procedia, 40, pp.986-993.
Buganova, K. and Simickova, J., 2020, April. Increasing the organization's resilience through project risk management. In Economic and Social Development (Book of Proceedings), 52nd International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development (p. 163).
Butt, A.S., 2023. Impact of requirements planning on the success of the public residential projects in Pakistan. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 38(3), pp.1313-1351.
Ciric Lalic, D., Lalic, B., Delić, M., Gracanin, D. and Stefanovic, D., 2022. How project management approach impact project success? From traditional to agile. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 15(3), pp.494-521.
Compagnucci, M.C., Wilson, M.L., Fenwick, M., Forgó, N. and Bärnighausen, T. eds., 2022. AI in EHealth: Human Autonomy, Data Governance and Privacy in Healthcare. Cambridge University Press.
Cruz Villazón, C., 2022. Lean project management an application in reserch and technological development (RTD) projects.
Delbari, S.A., Davoodi, S.A. and Shamani, M., 2022. Modeling the Knowledge Areas of Project Management in the Project-Based Organizations of Electrical Industry Using DEMATEL Technique. Iranian Electric Industry Journal of Quality and Productivity, pp.0-0.
Denicol, J., Davies, A. and Krystallis, I., 2020. What are the causes and cures of poor megaproject performance? A systematic literature review and research agenda. Project management journal, 51(3), pp.328-345.
du Plessis, A., 2022. A systemic exploration of risks in mobile application development projects and environments (Master's thesis, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment).
Durdyev, S. and Hosseini, M.R., 2020. Causes of delays on construction projects: a comprehensive list. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(1), pp.20-46.
Edsvik, C., 2020. Strengthening the Competitive Advantage of Commissioning: Case study on a complex global project-based environment.
Errida, A. and Lotfi, B., 2021. The determinants of organizational change management success: Literature review and case study. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 13, p.18479790211016273.
Farrukh, A. and Sajjad, A., 2023. Investigating sustainability tensions and resolution strategies in the plastic food packaging industry—A paradox theory approach. Business Strategy and the Environment.
Flanagan, R. and Jewell, C., 2019. Code of quality management-guide to best practice construction quality management.
Gaborov, M., Karuović, D., Kavalić, M., Radosav, D., Milosavljev, D., Stanisaljev, S. and Bushati, J., 2021. Comparative analysis of agile and traditional methodologies in IT project management. Journal of Applied Technical and Educational Sciences, 11(4), pp.1-24.
Ghosh, A., Edwards, D.J. and Hosseini, M.R., 2021. Patterns and trends in Internet of Things (IoT) research: future applications in the construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(2), pp.457-481.
Gkeka, M., 2019. Adopting Project Management in Public Sector Organizations in Greece.
Gordwin, M., 2021. Managing Global Projects: Identify &Analyze the Most Important Elements to Improve Project Management Performance (Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University).
Hutchison, T.J., 2022. The emergence of the forensic and legal project manager (Doctoral dissertation, Middlesex University).
Iivarinen, S.M., 2022. Improvement proposals for speeding up customer delivery projects.
Jadoon, G., Ud Din, I., Almogren, A. and Almajed, H., 2020. Smart and agile manufacturing framework, a case study for the automotive industry. Energies, 13(21), p.5766.
Janhunen, E., 2022. Project management of internal development projects: tailoring a project management framework for the case organisation.
Järvinen, K., 2023. Project Management Selection Criteria: Which Is Better, Traditional Or Agile Method?.
Ju, X., Ferreira, F.A. and Wang, M., 2020. Innovation, agile project management and firm performance in a public sector-dominated economy: Empirical evidence from high-tech small and medium-sized enterprises in China. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 72, p.100779.
Jumaa, R.K. and Khaleel, A.S., 2022. Evaluation of the Application of Quality Management Systems in Projects Quality Management Guidelines According to the Specification ISO 10006: 2017: A Case Study in the Department of Engineering Construction. Journal of Techniques, 4(3), pp.87-98.
Kalaiarasan, A.K.M., 2022. Application of agile project management techniques in construction sector: an enquiry and analysis.
Kärki, J., 2023. The Role of an Engineering Contractor in Quality Assurance and Quality Control in E, EPC and EPCM Projects.
Koch, J., Drazic, I. and Schermuly, C.C., 2023. The affective, behavioural and cognitive outcomes of agile project management: A preliminary meta‐analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.
Kovtun, T. and Finohenova, I., 2021. Convergence in ecological system projects. Intelligent information systems for decision support in project and program management, pp.114-171.
Kumar, R., Singh, K. and Jain, S.K., 2020. Agile manufacturing: a literature review and Pareto analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 37(2), pp.207-222.
Lalmi, A., Fernandes, G. and Souad, S.B., 2021. A conceptual hybrid project management model for construction projects. Procedia Computer Science, 181, pp.921-930.
Machado, F., Duarte, N. and Amaral, A., 2023. Project Management Maturity in Renovation and Remodelling Construction Firms. Buildings, 13(2), p.557.
Martinsuo, M. and Geraldi, J., 2020. Management of project portfolios: Relationships of project portfolios with their contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 38(7), pp.441-453.
Mkhize, N.P., 2022. Toward relevant measures of performance to manage complexity in inclusive development projects.
Nagyová, A., Pačaiová, H., Markulik, Š., Turisová, R., Kozel, R. and Džugan, J., 2021. Design of a model for risk reduction in project management in small and medium-sized enterprises. Symmetry, 13(5), p.763.
Nakhleh, E., 2019. Relationship Between Time Estimation, Cost Estimation, and Project Performance (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
Noteboom, C., Ofori, M., Sutrave, K. and El-Gayar, O., 2021. Agile project management: A systematic literature review of adoption drivers and critical success factors.
Pawliczek, A., Kolos, P., Lenort, R., Kolumber, S. and Wicher, P., 2022. Management tools and systems-usage in logistics companies in the Czech Republic. Acta Logistica, 9(1), pp.85-98.
Ramos Steiner, L., 2020. A green BIM framework for sustainable building project management. A case study at Jacobs Italia SpA.
Ruan, K., 2019. Digital asset valuation and cyber risk measurement: Principles of cybernomics. Academic Press.
Scholz, J.A., Sieckmann, F. and Kohl, H., 2020. Implementation with agile project management approaches: Case Study of an Industry 4.0 Learning Factory in China. Procedia Manufacturing, 45, pp.234-239.
Schultz, J., 2021. The relevance of project management leadership skills in failed or underperforming projects.
Shevchenko, I.V., Tretyakova, S.N., Khubutiya, N.V. and Avedisyan, N.N., 2022. Assessing the Value of Marine Environmental Projects Using the Scrubbing System. In Big Data in the GovTech System (pp. 179-187). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Shyta, E., 2022. Managment Principles and Practices of Integrating Quality in the Project Life Cycle.
Stanitsas, M., Kirytopoulos, K. and Leopoulos, V., 2021. Integrating sustainability indicators into project management: The case of construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, p.123774.
Swain, P.K. and Pradhan, B.B., 2020. RISK MANAGEMENT IN TRADITIONAL AND AGILE RUNNING PROJECTS. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(6), pp.5357-5365.
Swanepoel, F., 2021. The development of a hybrid Agile Software Development Methodology through the integration of Agile Software Development Methodologies with Project Management Methodologies (Doctoral dissertation, North-West University (South Africa)).
Tam, C., da Costa Moura, E.J., Oliveira, T. and Varajão, J., 2020. The factors influencing the success of on-going agile software development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 38(3), pp.165-176.
Tonchia, S., Tonchia, M. and Mahagaonkar, 2018. Industrial project management. Berlin: Springer.
Vaštakaitė, G., 2022. Customized Manufacturing Project Management in Furniture Industry.
Villar-Fidalgo, L., Espinosa Escudero, M.D.M. and Domínguez Somonte, M., 2019. Applying kaizen to the schedule in a concurrent environment. Production Planning & Control, 30(8), pp.624-638.
Wang, Y. and Cheng, K., 2022. Expected Competencies Of Construction Management Graduates Working In China. International Journal Of Innovation, Management And Technology, 13(1).
WOLNIAK, R., 2022. PROJECT MANAGEMENT STANDARDS. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization & Management/Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Slaskiej. Seria Organizacji i Zarzadzanie, (160).
Woźniak, M., 2021. Sustainable approach in it project management—methodology choice vs. Client satisfaction. Sustainability, 13(3), p.1466.
Wright, A. and Lawlor-Wright, T., 2018. Project success and quality: balancing the iron triangle. Routledge.
Younus, D.A.M. and Younis, H., 2021. Conceptual Framework of Agile Project Management, Affecting Project Performance, Key: Requirements and Challenges. International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Management (IJIREM).
Zare Khafri, A., Sheikh Aboumasoudi, A. and Khademolqorani, S., 2023. The Effect of Innovation on the Company’s Performance in Small and Medium-Sized Businesses with the Mediating Role of Lean: Agile Project Management Office (LAPMO). Complexity, 2023.



The following are the survey questions you will be required to answer:

1.    To what extent do you agree that your company maintains the key principles and components of the ISO 10006 project management methodology?
a)    Strongly agree
b)    Agree
c)    Neutral
d)    Disagree
e)    Strongly disagree

2.    How strongly do you agree or disagree with the statement: "I have experienced significant differences between Agile Project Management principles and ISO 10006"?
a)    Strongly agree
b)    Agree
c)    Neutral
d)    Disagree
e)    Strongly disagree

3.    How strongly do you agree or disagree with the statement: "The ISO 10006 methodology significantly impacts the effectiveness of my work activities when implementing Agile methodologies in projects"?
a)    Strongly agree
b)    Agree
c)    Neutral
d)    Disagree
e)    Strongly disagree

4.    How strongly do you agree or disagree with the statement: "I frequently encounter challenging issues while managing projects with a certain degree of complexity"?
a)    Strongly agree
b)    Agree
c)    Neutral
d)    Disagree
e)    Strongly disagree

5.    How strongly do you agree or disagree with the statement: "I regularly come across opportunities while managing projects with a certain degree of scope"?
a)    Strongly agree
b)    Agree
c)    Neutral
d)    Disagree
e)    Strongly disagree

6.    How strongly do you agree or disagree with the statement: "Since the beginning of my involvement in project management, I have consistently faced fluctuating complications"?
a)    Strongly agree
b)    Agree
c)    Neutral
d)    Disagree
e)    Strongly disagree

7.    How strongly do you agree or disagree with the statement: "The rest of the management consistently follows ISO 10006 and Agile methodologies in their project management practices"?
a)    Strongly agree
b)    Agree
c)    Neutral
d)    Disagree
e)    Strongly disagree

8.    How strongly do you agree that the integration of ISO 10006 and agile methodologies has positive implications for leveraging their respective strengths in project management?
a)    Strongly agree
b)    Agree
c)    Neutral
d)    Disagree
e)    Strongly disagree

9.    How strongly do you agree that the integration of ISO 10006 and agile methodologies has positive implications for mitigating management's weaknesses in project management?
a)    Strongly agree
b)    Agree
c)    Neutral
d)    Disagree
e)    Strongly disagree

10.    How strongly do you agree or disagree with the statement: "Incorporating integrated ISO 10006 and Agile approaches positively impacts project success rates"?
a)    Strongly agree
b)    Agree
c)    Neutral
d)    Disagree
e)    Strongly disagree

11.    How strongly do you agree or disagree with the statement: "The integration of ISO 10006 and Agile Project Management methodologies leads to more efficient resource allocation in manufacturing projects"?
a)    Strongly agree
b)    Agree
c)    Neutral
d)    Disagree
e)    Strongly disagree

12.    How strongly do you agree or disagree with the statement: "Adopting a combined approach of ISO 10006 and Agile methodologies enhances team collaboration and communication in manufacturing project management"?
a)    Strongly agree
b)    Agree
c)    Neutral
d)    Disagree
e)    Strongly disagree


Open-ended interview questions:

1. Can you describe a situation where the principles of ISO 10006 have directly influenced the outcome of a project? What were the key factors that contributed to the success or challenges faced?
2. Are you using any agile methodologies? If yes, which agile tools or techniques are you using? What impact do they have on the project?
The transcript of the Qualitative findings are as follows:

RESPONDENT Question 1 Response Question 2 Response
1 In a software development project, adherence to ISO 10006 ensured effective communication and stakeholder engagement. Regular project reviews and documented processes mitigated risks, contributing to successful project completion. Yes, we follow Scrum methodology, utilizing tools like Jira and conducting regular sprint reviews. Agile practices enhance collaboration and adaptability, positively impacting project delivery.
2 Unfortunately, we deviated from ISO 10006 principles in a construction project. Inadequate communication led to misunderstandings, delays, and increased costs. This highlighted the importance of robust project communication frameworks. No, our organization still relies on traditional waterfall methods. We're exploring agile, but the transition poses challenges in terms of changing mindsets and established workflows.
3 ISO 10006 played a key role in a manufacturing project where quality management was critical. The structured approach ensured that quality objectives were met, reducing defects and rework. This proactive quality management positively influenced project outcomes. Absolutely, we're using Kanban to manage our marketing campaigns. The visual boards help in tracking tasks, and the iterative nature of Kanban allows us to respond swiftly to changes, improving overall project efficiency.
4 We faced challenges in an IT project due to non-compliance with ISO 10006. Poorly defined roles and responsibilities led to confusion, and the absence of a structured communication plan resulted in missed deadlines and client dissatisfaction. While we've adopted elements of agile, our implementation lacks discipline. Frequent scope changes and inconsistent sprint planning have resulted in scope creep and project delays. We're working to refine our agile practices.
5 I'm not familiar with ISO 10006, but I'm eager to learn about its principles and how they can contribute to project success. Our organization is currently evaluating different methodologies, and agile is one of the options under consideration. I look forward to exploring its potential impact on our projects.

We Can Help!

Are you confident that you will achieve the grade? Our best Expert will help you improve your grade

Order Now

Related Samples

Chat on WhatsApp
Call Now
Chat on WhatsApp
Call Now

Best Universities In Australia

Best In Countries

Upload your requirements and see your grades improving.

10K+ Satisfied Students. Order Now

Disclaimer: The reference papers given by DigiAssignmentHelp.com serve as model papers for students and are not to be presented as it is. These papers are intended to be used for reference & research purposes only.
Copyright © 2022 DigiAssignmentHelp.com. All rights reserved.

100% Secure Payment