Introduction

The National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Plan 2021-2031 is a strategic plan that seeks to improve the health of Indigenous Australians. This policy has a broad, culturally-informed framework addressing fundamental concerns like mental health, housing, and food insecurity (NACCHO, 2021). It aims at improving health equity for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people by promoting health care systems that are culturally safe and address social factors that affect health. 

This essay will critically assess the health plan based on the Health Policy Triangle model. This analysis will also integrate theories of power to examine the roles of various actors, such as government agencies and community-controlled health services, in shaping the policy. 

The discussion will be broken down into sections touching on the policy objectives, interactions between the various stakeholders, rationale for the policy, and the stages followed in developing the policy. The following research proposal seeks to provide an overall evaluation on the positive aspects and the weaknesses of the health plan. 

Purpose of the Policy and Issue Framing

The National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Plan 2021-2031 is designed to significantly decrease the health disparity among Indigenous Australians. It is important to reduce the life expectancy gap and relieve the burden of chronic diseases, as well as incorporate social, emotional, and cultural aspects into the policy (Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, n. d.). This emphasizes the need for culturally secure, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander-controlled health services and for services that are culturally appropriate. 

In this regard, the policy aims at achieving the Closing the Gap targets and enhancing the health equality and access to necessary services. The health issues in the plan are framed in terms of the social determinants that worsen disparities, including housing, food, and health care (Lloyd‐Johnsen et al., 2023). This strengths-based narrative moves away from deficit thinking and instead highlights the ability of Indigenous communities to address their health. Although the policy addresses issues like systemic racism as a structural factor, there are still some gaps in addressing these root causes of inequities. However, the focus on community participation is a step toward righting the stories of health.

Power Dynamics determine the health priorities that the policy seeks to address. Thus, the policy aims at empowering Indigenous people by supporting the implementation of Indigenous-controlled solutions and encouraging the participation of Aboriginal-governed health organizations, which will shift the power from the centralized healthcare systems to the local culturally appropriate ones (Krahe et al., 2023).

This change is due to an acknowledgment of past inequalities, but the policy’s emphasis on specific health concerns—like chronic diseases—suggests that governmental and organizational agendas play a role. While this approach increases Indigenous representation in policy decision-making, it is crucial to continue advocating for all health concerns to be given the same consideration. 

Contextual Influences

The National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Plan 2021-2031 was developed based on historical, social, economic, and political factors. In the past, colonization and racism deprived Indigenous Australians of adequate healthcare, limiting their access to it (Kendall et al., 2020). These policies left a lasting imprint, which helped to shape health disparities that are still felt today. Socially, poor housing, low education, and unemployment have compounded these health challenges, therefore the social determinants of health, are an important factor in the plan (Brodie, 2023). On the economic aspect, Indigenous people suffer from financial constraints to access quality health care and reside in areas where primary health care is almost a mirage (Brodie, 2023). 

From the political perspective, the policy’s emergence is linked to the broader Closing the Gap policy, an Indigenous affairs policy that seeks to address the disparities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians (Butler et al., 2022). ACCHOs have become influential in the policy’s development and its core tenets are based on culturally safe, comprehensive care. This shift highlights the role of Indigenous people in managing their health and wellbeing. Additionally, the increase in political activism and struggles for Indigenous people’s rights and self-determination has impacted the transformation of the policy from a government-focus approach to a community-based policy. 

Lukes’ three dimensions of power are also present in the policy-making process (Sievers & Jones, 2020). Regarding the decision-making authority, Indigenous people were also involved in the policy-making process, and their main focus was on the priorities of the Indigenous communities. Non-decision-making power, which entails regulating what issues get on the agenda, was countered by making mental health, chronic illness, and social determinants part of the discussions. The Ideological Power, or the power to control beliefs and ideologies, is seen in the policy’s focus on cultural strength rather than on being a victim. In this way, the policy reframes health issues through the strengths perspective, which undermines the conventional top-down, paternalistic approach.

Stakeholders and Perspectives

National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Plan 2021-2031 encompasses a number of key stakeholders who are involved in the development and implementation of the plan. These include the Australian government, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, healthcare providers, and Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations (ACCHOs) (Hornby-Turner et al., 2023). The federal government of Australia, in the Ministry of Health, is responsible for funding, policy and regulation. Nevertheless, Indigenous organisations such as NACCHO and the ACCHOs are crucial stakeholders that can guarantee that the policy is implemented in a manner that is culturally appropriate for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. 

Communities of Indigenous peoples and their representatives were engaged to contribute to co-creation of the plan, which is a positive change in comparison with previous years (Fono et al., 2023). In contrast to prior policies that left out Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voices, this plan includes Indigenous voices and emphasizes that culturally appropriate and comprehensive healthcare must be at the forefront. ACCHOs have become significant in offering primary health care services, including medical care and other social necessities in aspects such as education and shelter. By being run by Indigenous communities, they not only provide healthcare services but are also Indigenous guardians of culture, which is in line with the policy’s approach.

However, even though this policy may represent a more inclusive process, there might be some groups whose input was not as significant. The omission of small healthcare providers or less conventional views points to the possible control of the most influential actors, including government bodies and large Indigenous associations, in the formation of the policy (Vance et al., 2024). Pluralism theories suggest that the policy aims at equal power between different groups while elitism suggests that some groups are still powerful and may ignore the less powerful groups.

It is also apparent that stakeholders have input in the prioritization of areas of focus, especially in the development of ACCHOs’ capacity. These organizations are not only the first point of contact for patients but also key to achieving the policy’s aim of tackling social determinants (Brodie, 2023). Through their active involvement in the enhancement of health equity, ACCHOs have ensured that they are a critical component in the policy. Thus, their role in structuring and influencing the healthcare delivery system at the structural and community levels makes them crucial to the transformation of Indigenous healthcare. 

In terms of policy, the balance of power implies shared decision-making processes through which Indigenous stakeholders have significant input on the policy and its execution (Butler et al., 2022). The government concerns itself with funding and regulation, but Indigenous organisations have much discretion over the policy’s practical application. This partnership can be considered as a shift from previously authoritative approaches to health policies based on cultural sensitivity.

Evidence Base

The National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Plan 2021-2031 has a sound and comprehensive grounding in the research literature which forms the basis of its strategic framework, addressing social and cultural factors affecting the health of communities. 
The studies show that essential indicators such as housing security, availability of safe water, and food sovereignty have a strong impact on the health of Indigenous Australians (Christidis et al., 2021). Data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) reveals alarming health disparities: for instance, Indigenous Australians who reside in remote regions are more likely to be admitted to a hospital for a preventable condition because they have inadequate access to primary healthcare. Such statistics call for more focused interventions, which the policy directly responds to by increasing community-governed health services. A further example of the extensive evidence base for the policy is its emphasis on culturally safe care. 

Research studies indicate that culturally safe care environments improve patients’ experiences and their health because they align with Indigenous cultures and values (De Zilva et al., 2022). The policy’s commitment to growing the size of Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations (ACCHOs) is grounded in this evidence, which illustrates that these organisations offer superior health services to Aboriginal people than conventional services. ACCHOs’ extensive care not only includes physical, but also emotional and social aspects with a focus on chronic illness and mental health – something vital because, unfortunately, Indigenous Australians continue to experience high levels of mental distress. Other research also points to the fact that trust and cultural safety in health care can result in improved patient compliance and health outcomes (Yashadhana et al., 2020). 

However, there is also an issue of selective use of evidence, and this is backed with evidence. Some scholars have pointed out that, although the plan has identified chronic disease and mental health, some other important areas of focus—systemic racism and economic inequality, for instance, are not given enough attention (Bryant, 2024). For example, Indigenous Australians are nearly twice as likely to commit suicide as non-Indigenous Australians and thus while the policy is largely focused on mental health, stronger organisational frameworks are still necessary to address the social and economic determinants of this problem (Ogilvie et al., 2021). Thus, the choice of some health outcomes rather than others may reflect political priorities related to the Closing the Gap strategy rather than the most comprehensive evidence-based approach.

However, the use of digital health technology like telehealth and point of care testing is a clear indication of how the policy has evolved to meet new challenges in health care especially during the COVID 19 pandemic. Findings obtained during the pandemic revealed that telehealth, which is an aspect of remote healthcare delivery, enhanced access for Indigenous people who reside in remote regions due to geographical barriers (Mathew et al., 2024). This innovation is especially significant in responding to the perennial issues of access to care in the rural and remote regions. However, though such an approach can be supported by research, the sustainability and validity of these solutions can only be determined after implementation. 

Moreover, the strategies for prevention in the policy such as smoking control, alcohol control, and nutrition are well supported by the evidence as to how they are useful in reducing health risks among the Indigenous people. For instance, indigenous Australians have a higher smoking prevalence compared to the population norm and bear a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases and respiratory illnesses than the non-indigenous population (Thurber et al., 2021). The assumption that the policy promotes the culturally appropriate health promotion programs is backed by the findings which indicate that Indigenous health literacy interventions are more effective than generic health messages. 

Hence, while the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Plan is well-supported by evidence, especially when it comes to chronic diseases, mental health, and cultural safety, there are some issues with the way some parts of the evidence are being translated. The policy may also need more holistic intervention that focuses as much on structural problems such as racism and socio-economic disadvantage. However, the general use of both quantitative data and community insights makes sure that the policy stays relevant to the needs of Indigenous Australians. Sustaining the policy into the next decade will require a constant review and adjustment of the policy.

Policy Development Process

The National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Plan 2021-2031 can be effectively examined using the Health Policy Triangle based on content, context, actors, and processes. 

The content of the policy focuses on the priorities of health equity, such as chronic diseases and mental health. It also promotes culturally secure care, especially through the growth of Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations (ACCHOs) that offer comprehensive health services that address the physical, mental, and cultural health of the people (Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, n. d.). This content is based on the social determinants of health, namely housing, food insecurity, and culturally safe services. 

The context in which the policy operates is informed by Australia’s historical and present health disparities. The Indigenous Australians are more prone to chronic diseases like diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and mental health issues (Brodie, 2023). Furthermore, inadequate access to healthcare services and its unequal distribution, particularly in the rural and remote areas, also play a role in these issues. The goals of the plan align with the Closing the Gap initiative that focuses on reducing these disparities and enhancing the Indigenous Australians’ experience of care. 

Actors include the Australian Government, leaders in Aboriginal health, and Aboriginal health organisations such as the National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation (NACCHO). This is a step towards co-creation, where Indigenous populations are engaged in the development of health care policies (Vance et al., 2024). Government funding and regulation are offered, but they partake in policy decisions with Indigenous organisations to ensure that the policy reflects the requirements and concerns of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. 

Process involved extensive consultations with Indigenous communities, health professionals, and other stakeholders (Lloyd‐Johnsen et al., 2023). The development of the policy harped on a culturally safe, place-based care and the requirement to guarantee the adequacy of the plan for Indigenous Australians. One such area was the integration of evidence-based practices such as telemedicine and digital health solutions especially given the circumstances posed by the COVID-19 pandemic that negatively impacted the access of healthcare.

Power in the Process

Power dynamics formed the essence of the formulation and implementation of the policy. In the past, Indigenous Australians were excluded from policy decision-making, but this plan was a step towards a more inclusive policy. NACCHO and other Indigenous-controlled health services played a leadership role in the policy process to ensure that the priorities of the communities were integrated into the policy (Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, n. d.). Though funding and regulation are still controlled by the government, the role of Indigenous organizations shows the balanced distribution of power. 

Nonetheless, even today, government agencies retain considerable power, particularly in terms of monitoring policy execution and funding (Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, n. d.). However, the co-design process is a positive move towards addressing previous power dynamics that have marginalized Indigenous people and allowing them to drive change in healthcare. 

The process of the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Plan contains some features of both incrementalism and rationalism (Tremblay, 2023). On the one hand, it is derived from the previously existing plans, for example, the 2013–2023 plan, which indicates a gradual approach to solving the problems of health inequality. For instance, the expansion of ACCHOs is a process that is ongoing in a bid to make healthcare more community-controlled. 

However, the policy also operates on a rational model by employing research-based approaches to solve particular health issues. Thus, the experience of using telehealth and digital health solutions during the COVID-19 pandemic reflects a rational action based on the evidence of the lack of access to healthcare in remote areas. The emphasis on chronic diseases and mental health is also based on the findings revealing that these areas are the most pressing health concerns for Indigenous Australians. 

Conclusion

The National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Plan 2021-2031 represents a significant shift in the right direction in tackling health inequities that Indigenous Australians continue to experience. Culturally safe, community-led and founded upon the vision of a healthcare system that is responsive to the needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, it offers hope for the future. This way it not only addresses symptoms but also addresses the root causes because it deals with social determinants.

However, its success depends on the ability of stakeholders to make a long-term commitment and be held accountable. As much as the inclusion of Indigenous people’s voices is an incredible accomplishment, it is essential to note that structural problems such as racism and economic disparity cannot be solved by mere voice representation. True transformation will require sustained awareness, flexibility, and partnership.

 

Top Healthcare Samples

References

Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. (n.d.). National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Plan 2021–2031. https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/national-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-health-plan-2021-2031?language=en 
Brodie, T. (2023). Knowledge to Action: Addressing the social determinants of health to promote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social and Emotional Wellbeing (Doctoral dissertation). https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/139742/1/Brodie2023_PhD.pdf 
Bryant, N. (2024). Introducing Indigenist Critical Policy Analysis: A rights‐based approach to analysing public policies and processes. Australian Journal of Social Issues. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.350 
Butler, T., Gall, A., Garvey, G., Ngampromwongse, K., Hector, D., Turnbull, S., ... & Anderson, K. (2022). A comprehensive review of optimal approaches to co-design in health with First Nations Australians. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(23), 16166. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316166 
Christidis, R., Lock, M., Walker, T., Egan, M., & Browne, J. (2021). Concerns and priorities of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples regarding food and nutrition: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. International journal for equity in health, 20, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01551-x 
De Zilva, S., Walker, T., Palermo, C., & Brimblecombe, J. (2022). Culturally safe health care practice for Indigenous Peoples in Australia: A systematic meta-ethnographic review. Journal of health services research & policy, 27(1), 74-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196211041835 
Fono, M. A., Parter, C., Chapman, F., Knight, J., Christie, V., & Gwynne, K. (2023) Co-Designing Australia's National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Plan 2021-2031: A Realist Evaluation. Available at SSRN 4872345. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4872345 
Hornby-Turner, Y. C., Russell, S. G., Quigley, R., Matthews, V., Larkins, S., Hayman, N., ... & Strivens, E. (2023). Safeguarding against Dementia in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities through the Optimisation of Primary Health Care: A Project Protocol. Methods and protocols, 6(5), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps6050103 
Kendall, S., Lighton, S., Sherwood, J., Baldry, E., & Sullivan, E. A. (2020). Incarcerated Aboriginal women’s experiences of accessing healthcare and the limitations of the ‘equal treatment’principle. International Journal for Equity in Health, 19, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-1155-3 
Krahe, M. A., Hall, K. K., Anderson, P. J., & Shannon, C. (2023). Mapping the knowledge structure and trends in Australian Indigenous health and wellbeing research from 2003 to 2022: a scientometric analysis. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1290322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1290322 
Lloyd‐Johnsen, C., Eades, S., D'Aprano, A., & Goldfeld, S. (2023). What's data got to do with it? A scoping review of data used as evidence in policies promoting the health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in the Northern Territory, Australia. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 34(2), 443-471. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.670 
Mathew, S., Fitts, M. S., Liddle, Z., Bourke, L., Campbell, N., Murakami-Gold, L., ... & Wakerman, J. (2024). Primary health care utilisation and delivery in remote Australian clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Primary Care, 25(1), 240. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02485-3 
NACCHO. (2021). 10-year plan to improve Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health. https://www.naccho.org.au/10-year-plan-to-improve-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-health/ 
Ogilvie, J. M., Tzoumakis, S., Allard, T., Thompson, C., Kisely, S., & Stewart, A. (2021). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders for Indigenous Australians: a population-based birth cohort study. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 30, e21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S204579602100010X 
Sievers, T., & Jones, M. D. (2020). Can power be made an empirically viable concept in policy process theory? Exploring the power potential of the Narrative Policy Framework. International Review of Public Policy, 2(2: 1), 90-114. https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.942 
Thurber, K. A., Banks, E., Joshy, G., Soga, K., Marmor, A., Benton, G., ... & Lovett, R. (2021). Tobacco smoking and mortality among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults in Australia. International Journal of Epidemiology, 50(3), 942-954. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa274 
Tremblay, P. (2023). The Devolution Dilemma. https://anzsog.edu.au/app/uploads/2022/10/ANZOG-paper-on-the-devolution-problem-Final-4-Tremblay-Cowley.pdf 
Vance, A., McGaw, J., O'Rorke, D., White, S., & Eades, S. (2024). Culture, Health and Well-Being: Yarning with the Victorian First Nations Community. International Journal of Indigenous Health, 19(1), 1-17. https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/ijih/article/download/41307/32591/116435 
Yashadhana, A., Fields, T., Blitner, G., Stanley, R., & Zwi, A. B. (2020). Trust, culture and communication: determinants of eye health and care among Indigenous people with diabetes in Australia. BMJ Global Health, 5(1), e001999. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001999